2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A machine learning pipeline for classification of cetacean echolocation clicks in large underwater acoustic datasets

Abstract: Machine learning algorithms, including recent advances in deep learning, are promising for tools for detection and classification of broadband high frequency signals in passive acoustic recordings. However, these methods are generally data-hungry and progress has been limited by challenges related to the lack of labeled datasets adequate for training and testing. Large quantities of known and as yet unidentified broadband signal types mingle in marine recordings, with variability introduced by acoustic propaga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Delphinid clicks are particularly challenging to classify due to their high variability, notably due to variable source levels and beam width, and rapid attenuation of the clicks (Au and Benoit-Bird, 2003; Finneran et al, 2016; Kloepper et al, 2012; Moore et al, 2008). Only nonsupervised networks have so far been tested successfully to classify delphinid clicks (Frasier, 2021; Frasier et al, 2017). Although this methodology was successful in separating group clicks into different classes, only one taxonomic group of delphinid was clearly identifiable (Risso’s dolphin) in the latest study (Frasier, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Delphinid clicks are particularly challenging to classify due to their high variability, notably due to variable source levels and beam width, and rapid attenuation of the clicks (Au and Benoit-Bird, 2003; Finneran et al, 2016; Kloepper et al, 2012; Moore et al, 2008). Only nonsupervised networks have so far been tested successfully to classify delphinid clicks (Frasier, 2021; Frasier et al, 2017). Although this methodology was successful in separating group clicks into different classes, only one taxonomic group of delphinid was clearly identifiable (Risso’s dolphin) in the latest study (Frasier, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only nonsupervised networks have so far been tested successfully to classify delphinid clicks (Frasier, 2021; Frasier et al, 2017). Although this methodology was successful in separating group clicks into different classes, only one taxonomic group of delphinid was clearly identifiable (Risso’s dolphin) in the latest study (Frasier, 2021). Here, we show that supervised networks allow click classification from taxonomically different species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This requires the learning algorithm to generalize from the training data to unseen situations in a “reasonable” way. 40 …”
Section: Proposed Methodology and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lo pulsed signals were likely differentiated well because they were the most different from the other species in the dataset 20 and were not tested against Gg pulsed signals. Gg pulsed signals were included, though, in a deep network study recently 21 . Other strategies like combining wavelets and neural networks have differentiated between sperm whale and long-finned pilot whale clicks 22 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%