2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Machine Learning Model for Real-Time Asynchronous Breathing Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we reckon that the problem of motion artifact removal should be taken into account since in a real-life scenario, movements of the subjects can occur. To overcome this concern, different solutions have been proposed for both RR [ 20 , 28 , 47 , 48 ] and regarding HR [ 33 , 41 , 49 , 50 , 51 ]. Future works will be devoted to defining a tailored approach on our system, by combining the two different sensor technologies embedded (i.e., textile strain sensors and an M-IMU) to develop a sensor-fusion algorithm to remove motion artifacts occurring during real life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we reckon that the problem of motion artifact removal should be taken into account since in a real-life scenario, movements of the subjects can occur. To overcome this concern, different solutions have been proposed for both RR [ 20 , 28 , 47 , 48 ] and regarding HR [ 33 , 41 , 49 , 50 , 51 ]. Future works will be devoted to defining a tailored approach on our system, by combining the two different sensor technologies embedded (i.e., textile strain sensors and an M-IMU) to develop a sensor-fusion algorithm to remove motion artifacts occurring during real life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them transformed the 1D time series into spectrograms using wavelet transforms, Fourier transforms, etc. [ 19 , 35 ], whereas others obtained time–domain characteristics by plotting the waveforms directly onto a canvas [ 36 , 37 ]. The former strategy aimed to highlight the time–frequency characteristics, whereas the latter focused on the original time–domain information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This led to distortion of waveforms at different lengths. Although most breaths last for 4–6 s and 224 samples were sufficient to represent the characteristics of the normal and PVA cycles (longer than previously reported 150 samples for CNN [ 37 ]), the influence of the resampling processing should be investigated in the future. Future studies are required to apply this approach in real clinical settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mulqueeny et al [44] used a naïve Bayes machine learning algorithm with 21 features, including measures of respiratory rate, tidal volume, respiratory mechanics and expiratory flow morphology to a dataset of 5624 breaths manually classified by a single observer, resulting in an accuracy of 84%, but a sensitivity of only 59%. Loo et al [45] trained a convolutional neural network with 5500 abnormal and 5500 normal breathing cycles aimed at developing an algorithm capable of separating normal from abnormal breathing cycles, reporting 96.9% sensitivity and 63.7% specificity.…”
Section: Mechanical Ventilationmentioning
confidence: 99%