2022
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.832567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Machine Learning Method to Trace Cancer Primary Lesion Using Microarray-Based Gene Expression Data

Abstract: Cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) is a heterogeneous group of cancers whose tissue of origin remains unknown after detailed investigation by conventional clinical methods. The number of CUP accounts for roughly 3%–5% of all human malignancies. CUP patients are usually treated with broad-spectrum chemotherapy, which often leads to a poor prognosis. Recent studies suggest that the treatment targeting the primary lesion of CUP will significantly improve the prognosis of the patient. Therefore, it is urgent to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using genomic profiling data as an example, bioinformatics and ML algorithms are applied to score and rank the most relevant genes for creating tumor–gene associations and constructing TOO classifiers. Several ML algorithms to identify the TOO of CUP have been applied in this context [ 28 , 29 , 33 , 42 , 44 , 45 , 52–54 , 57 , 58 , 64 , 73 , 96 ] ( Supplementary Figure 3 and Table 2 ). These associations are subsequently assessed through independent validation sets, and the classifier’s efficacy is further verified with challenging clinical cases.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using genomic profiling data as an example, bioinformatics and ML algorithms are applied to score and rank the most relevant genes for creating tumor–gene associations and constructing TOO classifiers. Several ML algorithms to identify the TOO of CUP have been applied in this context [ 28 , 29 , 33 , 42 , 44 , 45 , 52–54 , 57 , 58 , 64 , 73 , 96 ] ( Supplementary Figure 3 and Table 2 ). These associations are subsequently assessed through independent validation sets, and the classifier’s efficacy is further verified with challenging clinical cases.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%