2022
DOI: 10.3390/foods11040602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Machine Learning Method for the Quantitative Detection of Adulterated Meat Using a MOS-Based E-Nose

Abstract: Meat adulteration is a global problem which undermines market fairness and harms people with allergies or certain religious beliefs. In this study, a novel framework in which a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1DCNN) serves as a backbone and a random forest regressor (RFR) serves as a regressor, named 1DCNN-RFR, is proposed for the quantitative detection of beef adulterated with pork using electronic nose (E-nose) data. The 1DCNN backbone extracted a sufficient number of features from a multichann… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, regarding the SSC prediction, the PCR, MLR, and PLS models exhibited low accuracy (R 2 = 0.64–0.66), while the SVR model managed to predict the SSC of potatoes with high precision (93%). The results of this research (about acidity) were consistent with the reports by Huang and Gu [ 60 ], who used a sensor array and machine learning (SVR) to distinguish pork-fake beef with an accuracy of 92%. In another research, Wu et al [ 61 ] utilized an E-nose to detect and predict the contamination of sweet potato with C. Fimbriata with a respective accuracy of 65 and 66% for PLS and PCR, which is very close to the results of this research on the SSC.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, regarding the SSC prediction, the PCR, MLR, and PLS models exhibited low accuracy (R 2 = 0.64–0.66), while the SVR model managed to predict the SSC of potatoes with high precision (93%). The results of this research (about acidity) were consistent with the reports by Huang and Gu [ 60 ], who used a sensor array and machine learning (SVR) to distinguish pork-fake beef with an accuracy of 92%. In another research, Wu et al [ 61 ] utilized an E-nose to detect and predict the contamination of sweet potato with C. Fimbriata with a respective accuracy of 65 and 66% for PLS and PCR, which is very close to the results of this research on the SSC.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…(6) Return the optimal kernel parameters and regularisation coefficients to KELM to implement the ISHO-KELM model. The beef dataset is a publicly available dataset based on the PEN3 E-nose instrument by Huang and Gu [55] from Beijing University of Chemical Technology, where the researchers mixed minced beef with minced pork in seven different weight ratios (0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, and 60%) to simulate adulteration conditions. High This dataset included seven adulterated proportions of meat, with 30 sets of measurements for each, for a total of 210 sets of meat measurements.…”
Section: Isho-kelmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1DCNN) and random forest regressor (RFR) which is as combined known as 1DCNN-RFR was proposed by Changquan Huang and Yu Gu 2022 [58]. This 1DCNN-RFR method is being used for the quantity recognition and detection of pork meat adulterated using ENose data.…”
Section: Enose Parts: Pre-processing and Post-processing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%