2021
DOI: 10.3390/w13233461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Machine Learning Framework for Olive Farms Profit Prediction

Abstract: Agricultural systems are constantly stressed due to higher demands for products. Consequently, water resources consumed on irrigation are increased. In combination with the climatic change, those are major obstacles to maintaining sustainable development, especially in a semi-arid land. This paper presents an end-to-end Machine Learning framework for predicting the potential profit from olive farms. The objective is to estimate the optimal economic gain while preserving water resources on irrigation by conside… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Resampling, including normal, repeated, nested, leave-one-out KFCV, was used by [38] to split a dataset for training different ML algorithms (linear regression, Bayes ridge regression, ridge regression, LASSO regression, K-nearest neighbors, CART decision trees, support vector machines regression-SVMR, extreme gradient boosting, gradient boosting, random forests, and extra trees) to predict profits in olive farms. Their results presented a better performance for SVMR compared to the others, and the resampling technique outperformed the other splitting techniques.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resampling, including normal, repeated, nested, leave-one-out KFCV, was used by [38] to split a dataset for training different ML algorithms (linear regression, Bayes ridge regression, ridge regression, LASSO regression, K-nearest neighbors, CART decision trees, support vector machines regression-SVMR, extreme gradient boosting, gradient boosting, random forests, and extra trees) to predict profits in olive farms. Their results presented a better performance for SVMR compared to the others, and the resampling technique outperformed the other splitting techniques.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While trying to make accurate predictions, resampling throughout the training phase was crucial since it made it possible to determine which algorithms generalized best depending on our data. Also, it considerably uses the process of hyperparameter tuning, which involves modifying specific parameters of algorithms to improve outcomes [35]. The commonly used variations on cross-validation are train/test split, leave one out cross-validation (LOOCV), k-fold cross-validation, etc.…”
Section: 3feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is similar to k-fold cross-validation, the main distinction is that n different data splits are carried out. Simple crossvalidation uses well-known k values (5 and 10) to reduce complexity [35]. Train-test split typically divides the dataset into training and test data in an 80:20 ratio and mimics how a model would perform on new and unseen data.…”
Section: 3feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former makes the input data trend stationary, while the latter checks the effect of any seasonal parameter in the model. Christias and Mocanu (2021) applies various machine learning algorithms for Olive farm profit prediction. However, it did not experiment with time-series based prediction.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%