2015 IEEE 14th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icmla.2015.46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Machine Learning Based WSN System for Autism Activity Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [ 15 ], the authors proposed a machine-learning-based WSN system for autistic-activity recognition. The system included a wearable device that tracked autistic patients using a global-positioning-sensor (GPS) module and communicated the location to caregivers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [ 15 ], the authors proposed a machine-learning-based WSN system for autistic-activity recognition. The system included a wearable device that tracked autistic patients using a global-positioning-sensor (GPS) module and communicated the location to caregivers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nugyen et al [ 54 ] have used binary rules that map sensor states to an activity label to classify new instances in near real-time (5 min time slices). Other straightforward approaches use real-time threshold based classification [ 92 ] or a mapping between gyroscope orientation and activities [ 81 ].…”
Section: Real-time Centralized Activity Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the set of features to be used has been defined, a classifier algorithm is required to generate the model. In the works on children’s activity recognition, there are different classifier algorithms that are implemented, such as random forest, k-nearest neighbor, support vector machines, Bayesian networks and artificial neural networks, among others [ 14 , 25 , 26 ]. Specifically, in the generation of children’s activity classification models using environmental sound, classical classifying algorithms, such as support vector machines, k-nearest neighbors, random forest, extra trees, gradient boosting and artificial neural networks, are used and compared, reaching accuracies between 40% and 99% [ 18 , 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%