2021
DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A machine learning–based biological aging prediction and its associations with healthy lifestyles: the Dongfeng–Tongji cohort

Abstract: This study aims to establish a biological age (BA) predictor and to investigate the roles of lifestyles on biological aging. The 14,848 participants with the available information of multisystem measurements from the Dongfeng-Tongji cohort were used to estimate BA. We developed a composite BA predictor showing a high correlation with chronological age (CA) (r = 0.82) by using an extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. The average frequency hearing threshold, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 )… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking the previous XGB-BA as an example, the R 2 of the model in the test set was 0.27, while the correlation between BA and CA was 0.75 in the nal results (BA to CA regression belonged to simple linear regression, so R = cor = 0.75, R 2 = 0.56) [19]. The same was also found in the XGB-BA based on the Dongfeng-Tongji cohort [31]. This might be because the model trained on the training set predicted BA on the full dataset, which introduced interference from parameter tuning and training over tting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Taking the previous XGB-BA as an example, the R 2 of the model in the test set was 0.27, while the correlation between BA and CA was 0.75 in the nal results (BA to CA regression belonged to simple linear regression, so R = cor = 0.75, R 2 = 0.56) [19]. The same was also found in the XGB-BA based on the Dongfeng-Tongji cohort [31]. This might be because the model trained on the training set predicted BA on the full dataset, which introduced interference from parameter tuning and training over tting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The correlation between our STK-BA and CA (r = 0.66) on the test set was better than previously published BA (r = 0.52) based on 19 blood biomarkers [19] but weaker than BA (r = 0.74) which considered 44 biomarkers including lung function. This phenomenon is plausible, depending on the population-speci c and age-related biosignatures in different datasets [31]. However, it is worth noting that we showed better CA correlations with the same number of biomarkers in the Chinese population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…et al, 2020; Zhong et al, 2020;Gialluisi et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2021). However, there are few studies that compare AI techniques with traditional statistical methods to construct a BA prediction model using clinical biomarkers.…”
Section: Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, we found in the previous ML-BAs that the correlations between BA and CA attained from the test data used for comparing model performances, and the full data, including both the training data and test data, showed obvious differences. [ 18 , 29 ]. The reason might be that overfitting makes the model outperform the test set on the training set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%