2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17103703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Machine Learning-Based Approach for Predicting Patient Punctuality in Ambulatory Care Centers

Abstract: Late-arriving patients have become a prominent concern in several ambulatory care clinics across the globe. Accommodating them could lead to detrimental ramifications such as schedule disruption and increased waiting time for forthcoming patients, which, in turn, could lead to patient dissatisfaction, reduced care quality, and physician burnout. However, rescheduling late arrivals could delay access to care. This paper aims to predict the patient-specific risk of late arrival using machine learning (ML) models… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e application of machine learning techniques in topics related to healthcare has been varied. For example, Srinivas and Salah [20] applied classification techniques, Random Forest, and deep neuronal networks to estimate consultation length and to predict noshows at a cardiology clinic; in [16], artificial neural networks models and multiple regression models were used to forecast blood supply at blood centers; in [21], supervised machine learning classifiers were induced to develop predictive models that identify the risk of a patient no-show to a clinical site; in [22], the authors compared four ML algorithms, namely, logistic regression, Random Forest, gradient boosting machine, and artificial neural networks to identify which one has the best performance to predict the patientspecific risk of late arrival to some ambulatory care clinics. In general, the research works report an effectiveness of around 80% to predict the event of interest, which provide evidence of the viability to apply ML techniques to help in healthcare problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e application of machine learning techniques in topics related to healthcare has been varied. For example, Srinivas and Salah [20] applied classification techniques, Random Forest, and deep neuronal networks to estimate consultation length and to predict noshows at a cardiology clinic; in [16], artificial neural networks models and multiple regression models were used to forecast blood supply at blood centers; in [21], supervised machine learning classifiers were induced to develop predictive models that identify the risk of a patient no-show to a clinical site; in [22], the authors compared four ML algorithms, namely, logistic regression, Random Forest, gradient boosting machine, and artificial neural networks to identify which one has the best performance to predict the patientspecific risk of late arrival to some ambulatory care clinics. In general, the research works report an effectiveness of around 80% to predict the event of interest, which provide evidence of the viability to apply ML techniques to help in healthcare problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many scholars are committed to the application of machine learning model in the daily work of the hospital. 75 , 76 It is based on large sample data in the study of patient satisfaction. 51 , 56 Therefore, we suggest using the random forest method to explore the influencing factors in future satisfaction-related research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of trees in the random forest and gradient boosting algorithms is changed from 100 to 1000 in increments of 100. A learning rate of 0.01, 0.05, and 0.10 is used based on the recommendations of previous studies [ 47 ]. The minimum observations for the trees’ terminal node are set to vary from 2 to 10 in increments of one, while the splitting of trees varies from 2 to 10 in increments of two.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%