2015
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A machine‐learning approach to negation and speculation detection for sentiment analysis

Abstract: Recognizing negative and speculative information is highly relevant for sentiment analysis. This paper presents a machine-learning approach to automatically detect this kind of information in the review domain. The resulting system works in two steps: in the first pass, negation/speculation cues are identified, and in the second phase the full scope of these cues is determined. The system is trained and evaluated on the Simon Fraser University Review corpus, which is extensively used in opinion mining. The res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(past tense of can) K 3. caused additional difficulties for the classifiers, and might be the reason why the baseline classifier, which used cues from the entire sentence, outperformed the chunk-based one for the category Hypotheticality. Many previous studies (for instance [4,8,14], but not [17]) have (i) grouped Hypotheticality and Uncertainty into one category, and (ii) treated, e.g., "think"/"should"/"could" as markers for Uncertainty regardless of the pragmatics (Ex. 1.3/1.4/2.4/3.4), which might explain why lower results were achieved here than in previous studies (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(past tense of can) K 3. caused additional difficulties for the classifiers, and might be the reason why the baseline classifier, which used cues from the entire sentence, outperformed the chunk-based one for the category Hypotheticality. Many previous studies (for instance [4,8,14], but not [17]) have (i) grouped Hypotheticality and Uncertainty into one category, and (ii) treated, e.g., "think"/"should"/"could" as markers for Uncertainty regardless of the pragmatics (Ex. 1.3/1.4/2.4/3.4), which might explain why lower results were achieved here than in previous studies (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern and emerging strategies of sentiment detection make use of text illustration nested on semantic vector spaces. Many researchers have used machine learning approaches to detect negation and prediction in sentiment analysis [15]. According to recent reports published in 2019 [13], the quantity of non-English pages is swiftly growing because the growth rate of English Web sites is much lower than many other languages such as Arabic, Chinese, or Spanish.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Sentimental Analysis and Its Achievementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taboada et al discuss lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis in a broader context [31]. More recent work developed machine-learning-based classifiers to detect speculation and negations particularly for sentiment analysis [32].…”
Section: B Modifier Detection For Sentiment and Opinion Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%