SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017 2017
DOI: 10.1190/segam2017-17729805.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A machine learning approach to facies classification using well logs

Abstract: In this work we describe a machine learning pipeline for facies classification based on wireline logging measurements. The algorithm has been designed to work even with a relatively small training set and amount of features. The method is based on a gradient boosting classifier which demonstrated to be effective in such a circumstance. A key aspect of the algorithm is feature augmentation, which resulted in a significant boost in accuracy. The algorithm has been tested also through participation to the SEG mac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hall (2016) introduced a Geophysical Tutorial where he showed a simple application of machine learning techniques for facies classification with a small dataset of seven wireline logs and associated interpreted facies extracted from ten wells of the H ugoton gas field in southwest Kansas. Several studies, i.e., Zhao et al (2015), Bestagini et al (2017), Sidahmed et al (2017), Bhattacharya and Mishra (2018), explored the usage of machines learning for classifying facies. Rock image classification using a deep convolution neural network has been done by Cheng and Guo (2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hall (2016) introduced a Geophysical Tutorial where he showed a simple application of machine learning techniques for facies classification with a small dataset of seven wireline logs and associated interpreted facies extracted from ten wells of the H ugoton gas field in southwest Kansas. Several studies, i.e., Zhao et al (2015), Bestagini et al (2017), Sidahmed et al (2017), Bhattacharya and Mishra (2018), explored the usage of machines learning for classifying facies. Rock image classification using a deep convolution neural network has been done by Cheng and Guo (2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In geophysics, specifically for well log measurements, unsupervised learning algorithms such as self-organizing map, cross-entropy clustering, and Gaussian mixture model have been applied to logs for automatic zoning and lithofacies recognition (Fung et al, 1995;Wu et al, 2018). Supervised learning methods, mainly classification or regression neural networks, have been employed for lithological classification, and permeability, porosity, or shear wave velocity estimation from well log data (Ahmadi & Chen, 2019;An et al, 2018;Anemangely et al, 2019;Bestagini et al, 2017). However, few works demonstrate the ability of their ML algorithms in generalizing to new data outside the training data set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although machine learning has been significantly used in geoscience fields, the application of this technique in core-based lithofacies identification, a key component to better understanding oil and gas reservoirs, is still limited. Machine-learning techniques have been intensely used to aid seismic-facies classification (de Matos et al, 2007(de Matos et al, , 2011Roy et al, 2014;Qi et al, 2016;Zhao et al, 2016Zhao et al, , 2017Qian et al, 2018), electrofacies classification (Allen and Pranter, 2016), lithofacies classification from well logs (Baldwin et al, 1990;Zhang et al, 1999;Bestagini et al, 2017), to predict permeability in tight sands (Zhang et al, 2018), and even for seismicity studies (Kortström et al, 2016;Perol et al, 2018;Sinha et al, 2018;Wu et al, 2018). Cored wells are important because they are the only data that provide the ground truth of subsurface reservoirs including the lithofacies variations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%