IJMERR 2020
DOI: 10.18178/ijmerr.9.9.1253-1263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Machine Learning Approach of Lattice Infill Pattern for Increasing Material Efficiency in Additive Manufacturing Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different infill patterns are used to achieve high-strength and lowweight structures for UAV parts. Also using different infill patterns can improve material usage efficiency [29,32,33]. Fig.…”
Section: Uav Desingn Proces For Additive Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different infill patterns are used to achieve high-strength and lowweight structures for UAV parts. Also using different infill patterns can improve material usage efficiency [29,32,33]. Fig.…”
Section: Uav Desingn Proces For Additive Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can relate to the macro characteristics of a single path, single layer, or multiple layers. As a result, several works focused on predicting geometry deviations in AM printed parts [115][116][117][118][119]. Inspecting visual defects has been a common way to judge product quality and is used in several ML models with tabular [63], graphic [120,121], spectrum [74] data as inputs.…”
Section: Macro Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their study, they illustrate the differences between the classical 2D structures such as honeycomb structures and the Gyroid 3D structures. In the findings of the study, they determined that the 2D structures provide greater compression and strength along one axis compared to the 3D patterns, yet offer less support along all dimensions due to the nature of the patterns [20]. One study that focuses on bioinspired infill pattern designs provides details on optimization for specific properties such as strength and resilience through the use of cellular or lattice structures, but does not provide information on the opportunities for more bioinspired infill pattern designs and how they can be used to increase strength of structures [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Podroužek et al performed a comparison test of 14 different infill patterns for additive manufacturing and structural applications to determine the compression strengths relative to one another [20]. In their study, they illustrate the differences between the classical 2D structures such as honeycomb structures and the Gyroid 3D structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%