2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A machine learning approach for traffic-noise annoyance assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Their predictive powers have been compared through several studies, both in laboratory conditions and from social survey data, and extensive description and discussion can be found in the literature [27][28][29][30]. Annoyance models for single or combined sources have typically focused on different disturbing source types, such as: road traffic [28,29,[31][32][33][34][35][36], railways [37,38], tramways [35,39], industrial noise [27][28][29]31,40,41], and aircraft noise [36,42]. Consequently, little is said about "wanted" sounds or sounds of preference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their predictive powers have been compared through several studies, both in laboratory conditions and from social survey data, and extensive description and discussion can be found in the literature [27][28][29][30]. Annoyance models for single or combined sources have typically focused on different disturbing source types, such as: road traffic [28,29,[31][32][33][34][35][36], railways [37,38], tramways [35,39], industrial noise [27][28][29]31,40,41], and aircraft noise [36,42]. Consequently, little is said about "wanted" sounds or sounds of preference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As principais funcionalidades dos métodos nos últimos 5 anos foram a classificação de tipos de ruídos [Kumari et al 2019], a predição de indicadores de níveis de ruído [Torija and Ruiz 2015], a classificação de níveis de ruído [Torija and Ruiz 2016], avaliação do incômodo causado por ruídos [Bravo-Moncayo et al 2019] e a detecção de eventos anômalos [Alías et al 2018]. Para essas aplicações, as técnicas mais usadas foram: máquinas de vetor de suporte (SVM) [Torija and Ruiz 2016] (12), redes neurais artificiais (ANN) [Torija and Ruiz 2016] (11), redes neurais convolucionais (CNN) [Kumari et al 2019] (11), florestas aleatórias [Liu et al 2020] (6), árvores de decisão [Ali Khalil et al 2019] (5), regressão [Bravo-Moncayo et al 2019] (3), regressão de vetores de suporte (SVR) [Giannakopoulos et al 2019] (3), processos gaussianos [Torija and Ruiz 2015] (2), modelos de conjunto [Nourani et al 2020] (2) e redes neurais recorrentes LSTM [Navarro et al 2020] (2).…”
Section: Aprendizado De Máquina Aplicado à Poluição Sonoraunclassified
“…It was found that the nonlinear ensemble techniques produced the best result, which improved the performance of single models with a great robustness. Apart from traffic noise level prediction, deep learning has also been applied to other traffic-related studies, such as traffic flow state estimation [24], traffic light detection and classification [25], traffic condition forecasting [26], autonomous driving [27] and traffic noise annoyance assessment, related to physical characteristics of sound and subjective perception of the person [28], etc. In the work of [29], a classification model was developed to distinguish road traffic noise and anomalous noise events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%