2016
DOI: 10.3390/ijms17081215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Machine Learning Approach for Hot-Spot Detection at Protein-Protein Interfaces

Abstract: Understanding protein-protein interactions is a key challenge in biochemistry. In this work, we describe a more accurate methodology to predict Hot-Spots (HS) in protein-protein interfaces from their native complex structure compared to previous published Machine Learning (ML) techniques. Our model is trained on a large number of complexes and on a significantly larger number of different structural- and evolutionary sequence-based features. In particular, we added interface size, type of interaction between r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By definition, a residue in a protein‐protein interface is termed hot spot if its mutation to alanine changes the free binding energy of the interaction substantially (ΔΔ G binding ≥ 2.0 kcal/mol). Since experimental alanine scanning is an expensive and time‐consuming procedure that is not applicable on a large scale, highly efficient in silico methods, often based on machine learning approaches, have been developed in order to predict hot spots from the native complex structure or even from the sequence of one of the binding partners . Feature‐based prediction approaches use a variety of different chemical and physical characteristics of interface residues, such as solvent accessible surface area, protrusion index, residue conservation, or B factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By definition, a residue in a protein‐protein interface is termed hot spot if its mutation to alanine changes the free binding energy of the interaction substantially (ΔΔ G binding ≥ 2.0 kcal/mol). Since experimental alanine scanning is an expensive and time‐consuming procedure that is not applicable on a large scale, highly efficient in silico methods, often based on machine learning approaches, have been developed in order to predict hot spots from the native complex structure or even from the sequence of one of the binding partners . Feature‐based prediction approaches use a variety of different chemical and physical characteristics of interface residues, such as solvent accessible surface area, protrusion index, residue conservation, or B factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since experimental alanine scanning is an expensive and time-consuming procedure that is not applicable on a large scale, highly efficient in silico methods, often based on machine learning approaches, have been developed in order to predict hot spots from the native complex structure or even from the sequence of one of the binding partners. [23][24][25][26] Featurebased prediction approaches use a variety of different chemical and physical characteristics of interface residues, such as solvent accessible surface area, protrusion index, residue conservation, or B factors. However, predictive performances of different methods vary with data sets, and experimental validations of those computational predictions are scarce.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unsupervised algorithms cluster objects depending on their features without providing predefined classes (Tarca et al, 2007). Both types of algorithms are used widely in different biological fields: coding region recognition, signal peptide prediction, biomarker identification, disease gene recognition, metabolic network detection, and protein–protein interaction (Bostan et al, 2009; Lingner et al, 2011; Swan et al, 2013; Jowkar and Mansoori 2016; Roche‐Lima 2016; Melo et al, 2016). Neural networks were recognized for usefulness in biological applications when it was used for recognizing the transcriptional start sites in Escherichia coli (Tarca et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue focuses on the development and application of different theoretical algorithms combining chemoinformatics, computational chemistry, bioinformatics, and data analysis methods. In the issue, we present a total of 18 papers with full versions of the communications presented at the conference as well as papers of other authors worldwide (direct submissions) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another work, Melo et al [2], from the University of Porto, Portugal, stated that understanding protein-protein interactions is a key challenge in biochemistry. In this work, the authors describe a more accurate methodology to predict hot spots in protein-protein interfaces from their native complex structure compared to previous published machine learning (ML) techniques.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%