2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Machine Learning Algorithm to Estimate Sarcopenia on Abdominal CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
85
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been several studies reporting the accuracy of automatic quantification of abdominal muscle area using deep learning (18)(19)(20)(21)(22). The algorithms used were different across studies, such as U-net neural network model, multi-atlas segmentation model, fully convolutional network (FCN), and augmented active shape model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several studies reporting the accuracy of automatic quantification of abdominal muscle area using deep learning (18)(19)(20)(21)(22). The algorithms used were different across studies, such as U-net neural network model, multi-atlas segmentation model, fully convolutional network (FCN), and augmented active shape model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automation of such techniques would make them clinically viable and could further promote the use of CT as the onestop-shop imaging prior to shoulder replacement surgery. In recent years, deep learning has emerged as a very effective classification technique, which has been applied with great success to medical image segmentation, including muscle segmentation in CT datasets [16][17][18][19], and detection of large rotator cuff tears from conventional shoulder radiographs [20]. However, to the best of our knowledge, this technique has yet to be evaluated for the prediction of the premorbid muscle boundaries, which are not distinctly and readily identifiable in the images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is research that studies the CT scan using automatic learning techniques, which evaluate the muscle volume of adults with sarcopenia, and the results are between 0.80 and 0.87 of precision [20][21][22][23][24]. A study on sarcopenia with similar technical characteristics to our study [20] used four classifiers, Random Forest, SVM, Gradient Boosting, and Logistic regression, with Random Forest as the best classifier, obtained an accuracy of 0.82. The article for the measurement of variables involved in the development of sarcopenia, using forecasting networks based on automatic learning approaches, where the results show an accuracy of 82%, analyzed 114 variables in this study [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%