2017
DOI: 10.16929/as/2017.1159.97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Lynden-Bell integral estimator for the tail index of right-truncated data with a random threshold

Abstract: By means of a Lynden-Bell integral with deterministic threshold, Worms and Worms [A Lynden-Bell integral estimator for extremes of randomly truncated data. Statist. Probab.Lett. 2016; 109: 106-117] recently introduced an asymptotically normal estimator of the tail index for randomly right-truncated Pareto-type data. In this context, we consider the random threshold case to derive a Hill-type estimator and establish its consistency and asymptotic normality. A simulation study is carried out to evaluate the fini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…same behavior which actually is noticed before byHaouas et al (2018). The optimal sample fractions k * of each tail index estimator are given in Tables 1…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…same behavior which actually is noticed before byHaouas et al (2018). The optimal sample fractions k * of each tail index estimator are given in Tables 1…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…We point out that the two estimators trueγ^1)(boldBboldMboldN and trueγ^1)(boldW have almost the same behavior which actually was noticed before by Ref. [15]. The optimal sample fractions and estimate values of the tail index obtained through the three estimators are given in Tables 1–4.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a simulation study, [15] compared this estimator with trueγ^1)(boldBboldMboldN. They pointed out that both estimators have similar behaviors in terms of biases and mean squared errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem has only been considered very recently, starting with Gardes and Stupfler (2015), who were ultimately interested in the estimation of extreme quantiles of Y . Several studies have since then proposed alternative techniques for tail index estimation in this context; we refer to Benchaira et al (2016a, b), Worms and Worms (2016) and Haouas et al (2017). The random right-truncation context should not be mistaken for random right-censoring, where the available information is made of the pairs (min(Y i , T i ), 1 {Y i ≤T i } ), 1 ≤ i ≤ n. The latter context has received a substantial amount of attention over the last decade: we refer to Beirlant et al (2007Beirlant et al ( , 2010Beirlant et al ( , 2016, Einmahl et al (2008), Gomes andNeves (2011), Ndao et al (2014), Sayah et al (2014), Worms and Worms (2014), Brahimi et al (2015), Ndao et al (2016), Stupfler (2016), Dierckx et al (2018) and Stupfler (2019).…”
Section: Convergence Of a Tail Index Estimator For Right-truncated Samentioning
confidence: 99%