1979
DOI: 10.1016/1385-7258(79)90012-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A lower bound for the permanents of certain (0,1)-matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(A perfect-matching or 1-factor is a set of disjoint edges covering all vertices.) This generalizes a result of Voorhoeve [11] for the case k=3, stating that any 3-regular bipartite graph with 2n vertices has at least ( 4 3 ) n perfect matchings. The base in (1) is best possible for any k: let : k be the largest real number such that any k-regular bipartite graph with 2n vertices has at least (: k ) n perfect matchings; then…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(A perfect-matching or 1-factor is a set of disjoint edges covering all vertices.) This generalizes a result of Voorhoeve [11] for the case k=3, stating that any 3-regular bipartite graph with 2n vertices has at least ( 4 3 ) n perfect matchings. The base in (1) is best possible for any k: let : k be the largest real number such that any k-regular bipartite graph with 2n vertices has at least (: k ) n perfect matchings; then…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The result of Voorhoeve [11] for the case k=3 answered a question posed by Erdo s and Re nyi [3]: is there an =>0 such that the permanent of any nonnegative integer n_n matrix with all row and column sums equal to 3 is at least (1+=) n ? So Voorhoeve's result shows that one can take == 1 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1.8]). This conjecture has been verified for bipartite cubic graphs (see [11,12] and also [10,Chapter 8]) but, beyond this, not much seems to be known about the number of perfect matchings in 2-connected cubic graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The infimum corresponds to random bipartite graphs G. Theorem 9.13 (Voorhoeve [54] for d = 3 and Schrijver [51] for all d). If G is a d-regular bipartite graph on 2n vertices, then [42] for an exposition.…”
Section: Theorem 99 ([36]mentioning
confidence: 99%