1996
DOI: 10.1109/48.485198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A low sidelobe technique for the direct measurement of scattering functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulation Study 1: First, we present a performance comparison of our SF estimator with an improved version of the cross-ambiguity estimator 4 proposed in [13] and the uncertainty product function (UPF) estimator [15]. The cross-ambiguity estimator used a maximum-length pseudonoise sequence of length 511 as sounding signal.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simulation Study 1: First, we present a performance comparison of our SF estimator with an improved version of the cross-ambiguity estimator 4 proposed in [13] and the uncertainty product function (UPF) estimator [15]. The cross-ambiguity estimator used a maximum-length pseudonoise sequence of length 511 as sounding signal.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13], a more sophisticated method is proposed that uses a cross-ambiguity function and is based on a statistical input/output relation combined with equalization and smoothing (a preliminary version of this method can be found in [14]). In [15], an SF estimator using a so-called uncertainty product function is presented; this estimator extends the twin processor method previously proposed in [16], [17]. Finally, Manuscript received January 10, 2003; revised May 22, 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Iterative methods for deconvolution of two-dimensional (2-D) signals or images are discussed in [1]- [3]. A direct measurement approach using specially designed waveform pairs and twin receivers is given in [4] and [5]. More recently, Hahm et al reviewed the effects of simultaneous range and Doppler spreading on the results of various iterative deconvolution methods and discussed some resulting signal design issues [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct method using high resolution waveforms is an efficient approach to estimate NBSF. But the problem with direct approach is that it is plagued by the self-clutter problem caused by the volume conservation property of the ambiguity functions [71]. In [68], [71], they have proposed a new technique applicable to the estimation of NBSF that is effective in reducing self-clutter as well as volume conservation effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of methods exist to perform the deconvolution, direct and iterative. A direct measurement approach using specially designed 132 waveform pairs and twin receivers is given in [68], [71]. Iterative methods are computationally intensive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%