2020
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2019.2943861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Low-Rank and Sparse Matrix Decomposition- Based Dictionary Reconstruction and Anomaly Extraction Framework for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) Detection Performance Evaluation: In this section, some traditional anomaly target detection algorithms are used for a comparison purpose, including global RXD [10], kernel RXD [36], SSRXD [13], collaborative representation detector [37], LSDRAD [21], SC-CNMF anomaly detector [27], BACON [12], and EDLRaSMD [20]. Then, the eight comparative algorithms and the PRLRaSAD were implemented for the five data sets.…”
Section: B Experimental Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3) Detection Performance Evaluation: In this section, some traditional anomaly target detection algorithms are used for a comparison purpose, including global RXD [10], kernel RXD [36], SSRXD [13], collaborative representation detector [37], LSDRAD [21], SC-CNMF anomaly detector [27], BACON [12], and EDLRaSMD [20]. Then, the eight comparative algorithms and the PRLRaSAD were implemented for the five data sets.…”
Section: B Experimental Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final update rules of the entire solution for the PRL-RaSMD method combine (21) and (22). Three matrices are updated alternately.…”
Section: B Prlrasad Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To avoid the extraction of background pixels, some methods utilize characteristics of low-rank and a sparse background to detect anomalies. With the assumption of similarity of spectral features and spatial features of the background, many of the latest anomaly detection (AD) attempt to learn a dictionary and detected anomaly by reconstruction error [23]- [27]. Other methods apply slowly varying signal analysis [28], matrix decomposition [29], [30] or optimal filters [31], [32] to detected targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unsupervised clustering, as a type of self-organized classification method, only extracts most background pixels which supply a relatively accurate measurement for anomaly salience [22] and spatial-spectral similarity [25]. It also supplies a relatively accurate data-set to construct a background dictionary [24], [26], [27]. Iterative computations is another effective method for solving this kind of problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%