2022
DOI: 10.1109/access.2022.3169495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Low-Overhead Reconfigurable RISC-V Quad-Core Processor Architecture for Fault-Tolerant Applications

Abstract: Radiation can affect the correct behavior of an electronic device. Hence, the microprocessors used for space missions need to be protected against fault. TMR (Triple modular redundancy) is used for mitigating various kinds of faults in an electronic circuit. Although TMR provides an excellent level of reliability, it takes a large area and suffers from high power consumption. To reduce the area and power overheads DMR (double modular redundancy) is used. The DMR approach significantly reduces the resource over… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shukla and Ray [41] implement a re-configurable DCLS approach within a quad-core processor based on the RISC-V ISA. The simple, custom-designed core is paired with a mode control unit and a fault detection and correction unit, which ensure proper execution and correction depending on a dedicated mode selection signal.…”
Section: System-level Reliability Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shukla and Ray [41] implement a re-configurable DCLS approach within a quad-core processor based on the RISC-V ISA. The simple, custom-designed core is paired with a mode control unit and a fault detection and correction unit, which ensure proper execution and correction depending on a dedicated mode selection signal.…”
Section: System-level Reliability Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shukla and Ray [41] present a quad-core RISC-V-based processor re-configurable for DCLS operation, introducing up to 17.9% area overhead over the base implementation, while our HMR unit offers more flexibility by introducing just 9% area overhead over a standard 12-cores PULP cluster. In addition, Shukla and Ray rely on saving just the last executed PC for the recovery, which is insufficient to determine the entire state of the grouped cores.…”
Section: State Of the Art Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%