2019
DOI: 10.3390/inventions4030047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Low-Cost Robotic Camera System for Accurate Collection of Structural Response

Abstract: Vision-based technologies are becoming ubiquitous when considering sensing systems for measuring the response of structures. Availability of proprietary camera systems has opened up the scope for many bridge monitoring projects. Even though structural response can be measured at high accuracies when analyzing target motions, the main limitations to achieving even better results are camera costs and image resolution. Conventional camera systems capture either the entire structure or large/small part of it. This… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent research has focused on developing more advanced and low-cost vision-based techniques for on-site applications with complicated conditions. For examples, Kromanis and Forbes [ 21 ] introduced a low-cost robotic camera system which allows collecting high pixel density for the accurate measurement of structural responses; other researchers have developed smartphone-based monitoring systems to measure structural deformation with an inexpensive cost [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has focused on developing more advanced and low-cost vision-based techniques for on-site applications with complicated conditions. For examples, Kromanis and Forbes [ 21 ] introduced a low-cost robotic camera system which allows collecting high pixel density for the accurate measurement of structural responses; other researchers have developed smartphone-based monitoring systems to measure structural deformation with an inexpensive cost [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To summarize, contact health monitoring sensors or non-contact sensors are primarily used in the existing literature about SHM theories and methods to identify static or dynamic characteristic parameters of structures; and, in combination with finite element analysis (FEA) and experimental analysis, structural damage identification and working status estimation are performed based on measured responses of the structure, so as to reveal whole-process static/dynamic behavior, mechanisms and evolutionary rules of the structure under actions of complex loads and environmental coupling. Thanks to definite physical meanings, these approaches have been employed in practical projects [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. However, they remain very vulnerable to limitations of corresponding technical conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding structural geometric deformation monitoring, it is both a key component of health monitoring in the field of bridge engineering [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] and a critical index of structural behavior evaluation for bridges. To a certain extent, anomalous changes in structural geometry give embodiments to present safety status of bridges in a real sense; and, different degrees of structural damages or defects in long-term service time are also embodied in such anomalous changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority studies have still been focused on measurements of small-scale laboratory structures or field measurements of large structures at a limited number of points for a short period of time. Rolands Kromanis et al [9] introduces a low-cost robotic camera system (RCS) for accurate measurement collection of structural response. The low-cost RCS provides very accurate vertical displacements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%