2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.09.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A low-cost autonomous optical sensor for water quality monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the cost of commercially available sensors has stimulated the development of alternative low-cost, robust sensors and data loggers: opensource software, electronics, and off-the-shelf hardware store items, combined with low-cost microcontrollers (Pearce, 2012). For example, low-cost water quality sensors have been developed and tested for parameters such as pH and conductivity, temperature, toxicity, and turbidity (Banna et al, 2014;Chapin, Todd, & Zeigler, 2014;Murphy et al, 2015;Tuna, Arkoc, & Gulez, 2013;Yagur-Kroll et al, 2015), although few sensors have actually been deployed in the field. Offthe-shelf cameras have also been applied successfully to record water level (Gilmore, Birgand, & Chapman, 2013) and discharge (Bradley, Kruger, Meselhe, & Muste, 2002;Tsubaki, Fujita, & Tsutsumi, 2011), plant phenology (Crimmins & Crimmins, 2008;Nijland et al, 2014), and cloud cover (Scholl, 2015).…”
Section: New Sensors and Data Loggersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the cost of commercially available sensors has stimulated the development of alternative low-cost, robust sensors and data loggers: opensource software, electronics, and off-the-shelf hardware store items, combined with low-cost microcontrollers (Pearce, 2012). For example, low-cost water quality sensors have been developed and tested for parameters such as pH and conductivity, temperature, toxicity, and turbidity (Banna et al, 2014;Chapin, Todd, & Zeigler, 2014;Murphy et al, 2015;Tuna, Arkoc, & Gulez, 2013;Yagur-Kroll et al, 2015), although few sensors have actually been deployed in the field. Offthe-shelf cameras have also been applied successfully to record water level (Gilmore, Birgand, & Chapman, 2013) and discharge (Bradley, Kruger, Meselhe, & Muste, 2002;Tsubaki, Fujita, & Tsutsumi, 2011), plant phenology (Crimmins & Crimmins, 2008;Nijland et al, 2014), and cloud cover (Scholl, 2015).…”
Section: New Sensors and Data Loggersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prolonged recording at the upper detection limit (1200NTU) indicated that the sensor had silted up following the first event. Bio-fouling of optical sensors remains a considerable limitation to monitoring certain parameters such as turbidity (e.g., Bourgeois et al, 2003 andMurphy et al, 2015), though self-wiping sensors that reduce or prevent siltation are increasingly being used (Bringhurst andAdams, 2011 andMurphy et al, 2015). The resulting NSEs suggest an overall very good performance of the model (where a perfect match between modelled and observed discharge would be 1).…”
Section: Event Hydrology and Water Quality Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design of water quality monitoring programs has always been a challenge due to the many variables that need to be included [14]. Additionally, water managers must respond to new challenges and to keep up with the latest developments and trends concerning the water quality research and monitoring, such as the chemical mixtures [15], microplastics [16], the management practices [17,18], recent legislation, and, especially, the goals set by the Water Framework Directive (WFD 2000/60/EC) of the European Community (EU) [19], but also new tools such as effect-based tools (bioassays, biomarkers [20,21]), remote sensing [22], advances in monitoring sensors (e.g., nanophotonic biosensors [23] and optical sensors [24]), and automation technology system [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%