2010
DOI: 10.4319/lom.2010.8.363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A low‐cost automated trap to measure bubbling gas fluxes

Abstract: We describe a trap that can be used for automated, high temporal resolution measurement of ebullition fluxes in aquatic environments. The trap comprises a submerged cone connected to a transparent PVC pipe that serves as a collection chamber. A differential pressure sensor at the top of the pipe measures the pressure caused by gas accumulation in the chamber. The sensor circuit consists of low-power electronics and can function for longer than 6 months on two high-capacity AA lithium batteries. The circuit, ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(38 reference statements)
2
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The fill height describes the water level within the gas capturing cylinder and was inferred by measuring the differential pressure between the inside and outside of the cylinder as described in Varadharajan et al (2010). Temperature measurements were performed using an RBR TR-1060 sensor with an accuracy of ± 0.008 • C attached to the ABTs.…”
Section: Measurement Of Ebullition Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fill height describes the water level within the gas capturing cylinder and was inferred by measuring the differential pressure between the inside and outside of the cylinder as described in Varadharajan et al (2010). Temperature measurements were performed using an RBR TR-1060 sensor with an accuracy of ± 0.008 • C attached to the ABTs.…”
Section: Measurement Of Ebullition Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, theoretical analysis shows that spherical bubbles of realistic size would be mobilized in sediments with reasonable shear strength only under unrealistically large vertical stress variations on the order 10 m of water head [Wheeler, 1990]. The ebullition record from UML [Varadharajan et al, 2010], however, shows gas venting in response to head drops of less than 0.5 m (5 kPa, Figure 102b), which implies that some other mechanism must mobilize bubbles for vertical transport.…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We constrain and test the model against a record of variations in hydrostatic load and methane ebullition from fine-grained sediments in Upper Mystic Lake (UML), a dimictic kettle lake outside Boston, Massachusetts [Varadharajan et al, 2010] (Figure 102a). Our model is motivated by two key observations: ebullition is triggered by variations in hydrostatic load [Martens and Klump, 1980;Mattson and Likens, 1990;Fechner-Levy and Hemond, 1996;Leifer and Boles, 2005;Varadharajan et al, 2010], and gas migration in fine sediments is controlled by the opening of fractures or conduits [Boudreau et al, 2005;Jain and Juanes, 2009;Algar and Boudreau, 2010;Holtzman and Juanes, 2010]. The high degree of synchronicity in ebullative fluxes among distant venting sites located at different depths (Figure 102) suggests that the release mechanism is governed by the effective stress, which is the average stress between solid grains [Terzaghi, 1943].…”
Section: A Conduit Dilation Model Of Methane Venting From Lake Sedimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ebullition of methane from this lake has been previously documented (Scandella et al, 2011;Varadharajan and Hemond, 2012). We collected gas bubbles using inverted funnel-shaped bubble traps [modified from an inverted-funnel design described previously (Varadharajan et al, 2010;Varadharajan and Hemond, 2012)] deployed~2 m above the lake floor (~18 m water depth) using a custom rope and buoy structure.…”
Section: (2009)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ebullition of methane from this lake has been previously documented (Scandella et al, 2011;Varadharajan and Hemond, 2012). We collected gas bubbles using inverted funnel-shaped bubble traps [modified from an inverted-funnel design described previously (Varadharajan et al, 2010;Varadharajan and Hemond, 2012)] deployed~2 m above the lake floor (~18 m water depth) using a custom rope and buoy structure.2 The deep deployment depth was chosen to minimize dissolution and/or oxidation of bubbles during their transit from the sediment to the lake surface. The collected gases were transferred via syringes to serum vials (either pre-evacuated or pre-filled with deionized water that was displaced to make room for the gas sample) sealed with blue butyl septa, fixed with either saturated NaCl solution or 1 M NaOH, and stored at either 4°C or room temperature until analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%