2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2011.6090520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A low cost, adaptive mixed reality system for home-based stroke rehabilitation

Abstract: This paper presents a novel, low-cost, real-time adaptive multimedia environment for home-based upper extremity rehabilitation of stroke survivors. The primary goal of this system is to provide an interactive tool with which the stroke survivor can sustain gains achieved within the clinical phase of therapy and increase the opportunity for functional recovery. This home-based mediated system has low cost sensing, off the shelf components for the auditory and visual feedback, and remote monitoring capability. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even expert clinicians cannot simultaneously observe all aspects of upper extremity pathological movement or compare such observations to a standardized value. There is considerable evidence showing that individual therapists direct their attention towards different elements and assess them differently when evaluating performance in situ and real-time, or when later rating videos of performance (Chen et al, 2011a;Cirstea and Levin, 2007;Nordin et al, 2014;Wolf et al, 2006). The relation of movement quality to function is therefore difficult to ascertain in a standardized quantitative manner (Levin et al, 2008;Chen et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even expert clinicians cannot simultaneously observe all aspects of upper extremity pathological movement or compare such observations to a standardized value. There is considerable evidence showing that individual therapists direct their attention towards different elements and assess them differently when evaluating performance in situ and real-time, or when later rating videos of performance (Chen et al, 2011a;Cirstea and Levin, 2007;Nordin et al, 2014;Wolf et al, 2006). The relation of movement quality to function is therefore difficult to ascertain in a standardized quantitative manner (Levin et al, 2008;Chen et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%