2015 Fifth International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and Its Applications (DICTAP) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/dictap.2015.7113166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A low complexity turbo receiver for data nulling superimposed pilots in OFDM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…+ A similar complexity analysis for DNST was done in [16]. Note that CM refers to complex multiplications.…”
Section: B Channel Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…+ A similar complexity analysis for DNST was done in [16]. Note that CM refers to complex multiplications.…”
Section: B Channel Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Receiver: This proposal differs from previous related works in data detection process. Its complexity lies in the number of complex multiplications (CM), which we calculate similarly as in [16]. The analysis is provided in Table II and Table III.…”
Section: Data Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regretfully, some information-bearing data at certain frequency bins in DNSP are removed prior to transmission, resulting in the symbol misidentification [13]. To tackle the issue of the symbol misidentification, the classic estimation algorithms such as minimum mean square error (MMSE) and maximum likelihood are introduced into DNSP [14]. Yet they are still facing many challenges, such as the availability for the second-order statistics of the channel and noise [15], the low estimation accuracy, and the high computational complexity [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regretfully, some information-bearing data at certain frequency bins in DNSP are removed prior to transmission, resulting in the symbol misidentification [13]. To tackle the issue of the symbol misidentification, the classic estimation algorithms such as minimum mean square error (MMSE) and maximum likelihood are introduced into DNSP [14]. Yet they are still facing many challenges, such as the availability for the second-order statistics of the channel and noise [15], the low estimation accuracy, and the high computational complexity [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%