14th IEEE Proceedings on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 2003. PIMRC 2003.
DOI: 10.1109/pimrc.2003.1259122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A low complexity suboptimal MIMO receiver: the combined ZF-MLD algorithm

Abstract: IEMN-DHS UMRCNRS X520. ENlC CitC Scicntifcquc -Rue Gugliclnio Mat-coni. 50650 Villcneuvc d'Ascq. Frailcc 4 I, Bd. Vaukin. 5W46 Lillc ~IEMN-DHS UMRCNRS. ISEN A b r n .~~~r -R e c e~i t l~. nirelcss technologies have known an incrc;iring succcss. rhos becoming an interesting field for study. O n e nf tlie topics o f r rch are multiple ante!ina arrays. Signal rreowr! in that rase is not obvious. Different methods with different performances have been suggestcd. F r o m il statistical analysis of wrvrs a t the out… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5. In the same figure, the performance of the following three MIMO detectors are shown for comparison: (1) ZF detector, (2) ML detector, and (3) combined ZF-ML detector [3]. As can be seen in the BER performance of the proposed classifier based MIMO detector is significantly better than that of the ZF-detector, i.e.…”
Section: B Performance Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5. In the same figure, the performance of the following three MIMO detectors are shown for comparison: (1) ZF detector, (2) ML detector, and (3) combined ZF-ML detector [3]. As can be seen in the BER performance of the proposed classifier based MIMO detector is significantly better than that of the ZF-detector, i.e.…”
Section: B Performance Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…On the other end of the complexity spectrum the equalizer based MIMO detection schemes can be found. These include zero-forcing (ZF) detector [3] and minimum-mean-squareerror (MMSE) detector [4]. The ZF-detector and the MMSEdetector have the minimal computational burden as they require only matrix operations, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(11) enjoys the best performance; However, it requires the highest complexity as well. As shown in [33], the number of arithmetic operations for the MLE in Eq. (11) is O |x| N M N. We learn from the comparison that the major advantage of LEs is their low decoding complexity.…”
Section: Complexity Comparison Between Les and Mlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although transmission rate can be improved by increasing frequency bandwidth and the number of antenna elements to be used for SR-MIMO transmission, signal processing complexity per unit time for MIMO detection is also increased, and as a result the power consumption is increased [5]. To solve the problem, we have proposed a simple decoding method [6] that reduces the complexity by performing MIMO detection with an analog circuit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%