2011 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference 2011
DOI: 10.1109/wcnc.2011.5779373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A low-complexity SLM based PAPR reduction scheme for SFBC MIMO-OFDM systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature also addresses [8] time domain channel tracking methods like MMSE, LMS, RLS adaptive estimators for OFDM systems. These methods use training symbols for estimator coefficient updating.…”
Section: Channel Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature also addresses [8] time domain channel tracking methods like MMSE, LMS, RLS adaptive estimators for OFDM systems. These methods use training symbols for estimator coefficient updating.…”
Section: Channel Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the new PAP is lower than in the previous step, retain b 1 as part of the final phase sequence, otherwise, b 1 reverts to its previous value. The algorithm continues in this fashion until all V possibilities have been explored [4]. In this way , the better phase factor can be found after only V times searching, but it is not the best one .…”
Section: B Optimal Ptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one major drawback of OFDM is its high peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR), which limits the performance of wireless communication systems: high power peaks in transmitted signals lead to a necessity for increasing the dynamic range of corresponding parts of the communication system in order to avoid clipping of signals. Numerous methods have appeared in the literature to improve the PAPR performance of OFDM signals [2][3][4]. Among them, partial transmit sequence (PTS) is known as a distortionless scheme which requires a small amount of redundancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a wrong estimation of the SI at the received side could damage the total signal recovery which leads to significant performance deterioration in terms of bit error rate (BER). Thus, several recent research works, known as blind techniques [15][16][17], have been proposed to avoid the sending of the explicit SI. Some of these studies required the use of a special phase rotations of candidate signals (0 or π) [15], which degrade the PAPR performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, several recent research works, known as blind techniques [15][16][17], have been proposed to avoid the sending of the explicit SI. Some of these studies required the use of a special phase rotations of candidate signals (0 or π) [15], which degrade the PAPR performance. The other proposed approaches are only relevant for two antennas [16] or are too complex to be implemented [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%