The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011 8th International Conference on Information, Communications &Amp; Signal Processing 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icics.2011.6173596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A low complexity linear regression approach to time synchronization in underwater networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison was made with other models such as Gaussian process regression (GPR) [46], linear regression (L.R.) [47], and nonlinear gaussian regression (NGR) [48] using…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison was made with other models such as Gaussian process regression (GPR) [46], linear regression (L.R.) [47], and nonlinear gaussian regression (NGR) [48] using…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like TSVP [10], RSUN employs two-way signal transmissions to obtain timestamps. Four timestamps are recorded for each beacon exchange: beacon sending (R i,1 ) and response receiving (R i,2 ) timestamps recorded at reference node (R) and beacon receiving (N i,1 ) and response sending (N i,2 ) timestamps recorded at neighbouring node (N ).…”
Section: Detail Of the Rsunmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze the impact of collision on synchronization accuracy, we study the performance of alternative approaches (TSVP [10] and MU-Sync [9]) in the literature under two different scenarios. First, we consider an ideal scenario with no collision and observe the performance.…”
Section: Impact Of Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation