1986
DOI: 10.1109/tc.1986.1676697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A LOTOS Specification of the PROWAY Highway Service

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first results are encouraging: the LOTOS specifications that have been produced so far (e.g. [1,3,12,17,40,41,43,44,45,47] and many others), indicate that such quite complex systems can be specified with an intuitively appealing structure, and be relatively concise (when compared with other formal description techniques). The conciseness and readability could be increased even further if good notational facilities are developed for the specification of data types, which now in many cases are a substantial part of a specification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The first results are encouraging: the LOTOS specifications that have been produced so far (e.g. [1,3,12,17,40,41,43,44,45,47] and many others), indicate that such quite complex systems can be specified with an intuitively appealing structure, and be relatively concise (when compared with other formal description techniques). The conciseness and readability could be increased even further if good notational facilities are developed for the specification of data types, which now in many cases are a substantial part of a specification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…When necessary, however, an Abstract Data Type (ADT) definition language may be adopted (as in [7,231). Indeed, process definitions and type definitions are "orthogonal," in that they do not place constraints on each other; the presentation in Section 2.1 simply presupposes data types and value expressions, but makes no assumption on how the former are defined or the latter evaluated.…”
Section: Data Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%