2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A lot sizing model with partial downstream delayed payment, partial upstream advance payment, and partial backordering for deteriorating items

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The station first pays a fraction of the purchasing cost in advance while taking an order, and then pays the remainder via cash on delivery. Recently, Taleizadeh (2017) and Diabat et al (2017) considered advance payment in the lot-size model under different conditions of the inventory model.…”
Section: Advance Paymentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The station first pays a fraction of the purchasing cost in advance while taking an order, and then pays the remainder via cash on delivery. Recently, Taleizadeh (2017) and Diabat et al (2017) considered advance payment in the lot-size model under different conditions of the inventory model.…”
Section: Advance Paymentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim and Sarkar [36] converted the basic single-stage production system to the multi-stage production system where they did not consider initial production and then demand. Diabat et al [37] extended the basic production model with partial downstream down payment. Kang et al [38] explained the effect of smart manufacturing technology based on the human quality control system.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Montgomery et al (1973) were the first who developed an inventory model by general presumptions of the classic EOQ model under partial backlogging of demand. Nowadays, many researchers consider shortages in their models, especially with different forms of payments such as Tripathi (2012), Taleizadeh et al (2013), Lashgari et al (2016), Diabat et al (2017), and Cunha et al (2018). For these studies, all assumed the fraction of shortage backordered is constant over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%