Abstract:Purpose
Although supply chain scholars have acknowledged the fundamental disruptive changes experienced by today’s supply chains and the ensuing novelty of the research problems worthy of investigation, they have primarily relied on a limited number of theories to help explain the phenomena of interest. The purpose of this paper is to use a systematic literature review to address this gap and propose additional theories that supply chain researchers can use to help address novel supply chain phenomena, such as… Show more
“…Masood et al (2006) have previously linked the CVF with the concept of situational strength, a theory which describes the "implicit or explicit cues provided by external entities regarding the desirability of potential behaviours for the firm" (Meyer et al 2010, p. 122). As situational strength has received little attention within the supply chain management field (Gligor et al 2019), this study provides a good opportunity to explore this theory within a SCRES context.…”
The purpose of this paper is to explore how organisational culture, represented by the competing values framework (CVF), and the relationship mechanisms of situational strength and power influence an organisation’s approach to supply chain resilience (SCRES). This is a conceptual paper which uses a multi-theoretical approach to create a framework outlining how organisations which possess different characteristics of culture within the CVF will work to achieve SCRES. Secondary analysis of four case examples as discussed in the supply chain and resilience literature are then used to support the development of propositions from this framework in more detail. The paper suggests that ‘flexibility focused’ cultures will create weaker situational strengths for supply chain partners when managing disruptions, while ‘stability focused’ cultures will create stronger situational strengths in the same scenarios. ‘Internally focused’ cultures may use coercive power with supply chain partners when managing disruptions, while ‘externally focused’ cultures will prefer non-coercive power in the same scenarios. The four case studies from the literature highlight that each type of culture within the CVF can enable an organisation to achieve SCRES. The practical implications of the findings are that managers should take into consideration how their organisation’s culture will influence their relationships with supply chain partners, depending on their application of power and situational strength. However, future research is required to empirically test the propositions.
“…Masood et al (2006) have previously linked the CVF with the concept of situational strength, a theory which describes the "implicit or explicit cues provided by external entities regarding the desirability of potential behaviours for the firm" (Meyer et al 2010, p. 122). As situational strength has received little attention within the supply chain management field (Gligor et al 2019), this study provides a good opportunity to explore this theory within a SCRES context.…”
The purpose of this paper is to explore how organisational culture, represented by the competing values framework (CVF), and the relationship mechanisms of situational strength and power influence an organisation’s approach to supply chain resilience (SCRES). This is a conceptual paper which uses a multi-theoretical approach to create a framework outlining how organisations which possess different characteristics of culture within the CVF will work to achieve SCRES. Secondary analysis of four case examples as discussed in the supply chain and resilience literature are then used to support the development of propositions from this framework in more detail. The paper suggests that ‘flexibility focused’ cultures will create weaker situational strengths for supply chain partners when managing disruptions, while ‘stability focused’ cultures will create stronger situational strengths in the same scenarios. ‘Internally focused’ cultures may use coercive power with supply chain partners when managing disruptions, while ‘externally focused’ cultures will prefer non-coercive power in the same scenarios. The four case studies from the literature highlight that each type of culture within the CVF can enable an organisation to achieve SCRES. The practical implications of the findings are that managers should take into consideration how their organisation’s culture will influence their relationships with supply chain partners, depending on their application of power and situational strength. However, future research is required to empirically test the propositions.
“…In doing so, we highlighted project management and supply chain management, as additional application fields for social identity theory. Accordingly, we showed how studying phenomena in supply chain management can be enriched by borrowing theories from other, related fields (Gligor et al , 2019). Moreover, this study shows how useful it is to combine multiple research theories for collaborations in projects and supply chains (Halldórsson et al , 2007; Kembro et al , 2014; Kolltveit et al , 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature draws on agency theory to explain the informational perspective (Eisenhardt, 1989). Within the supply chain literature, client-contractor relationships are often seen as principal-agent relationships, where the client is the principal and the contractor is the agent (Gligor et al , 2019; Hald et al , 2009; Halldórsson et al , 2007; Spina et al , 2016). Given these roles, collaborating partners each have specific information about the project and themselves that is not available to the other party.…”
Section: Conceptualizing Perceptual Distance In Client-contractor Collaborationmentioning
Purpose
This study aims to propose a tool for conceptualizing and operationalizing perceptual distance in client-contractor collaborations: the perceptual distance monitor (PDM). This paper explains how this monitor was developed and used to examine the impact of perceptual distance on project outcomes.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper developed the PDM by gathering quantitative survey data from client and contractor representatives. Structural equation modeling tested the predictive validity of perceptual distance on project outcomes.
Findings
The PDM enables a valid and reliable assessment of the perceptual distance between client and contractor in projects. Moreover, the PDM shows that project outcomes suffer if parties have different perceptions of project objectives, project managers’ competences and the level of trust in the collaboration. These findings confirm the predictive validity of the PDM.
Research limitations/implications
The study builds on survey data representing dyadic perceptions from 38 measurements in collaborative projects. This paper may not have identified all the effects of perceptual distance on project outcomes, as the analyses were conducted at the project level. This research underlines the importance of gathering dyadic data for studies in interorganizational settings.
Practical implications
Perceptual distance can be expected between clients and contractors, and higher perceptual distance is generally associated with lower project outcomes. Using the PDM, project managers can concretize, discuss and monitor this perceptual distance over time. The PDM provides project managers with a useful tool to prevent the escalation of conflicts and project failure.
Originality/value
Based on agency theory and social identity theory, this study provides a unique and validated conceptualization and operationalization of perceptual distance between client and contractor in interorganizational collaborations and supply chains.
“…Si les aspects relatifs à la stratégie, aux pratiques, aux outils ou encore aux ressources (matérielles) favorisant l'amélioration des performances (processus, financières, durables) des Supply Chains font l'objet de nombreuses recherches, il semble qu'un des éléments clés de la gestion et du pilotage des chaînes soit moins étudié : les ressources humaines. Alors même que l'approche basée sur les ressources (RBV, Wernerfelt 1984;Barney 1991) est particulièrement populaire en Supply Chain Management (Gligor et al 2019;Swanson et al 2018), il semble nécessaire de densifier les recherches relatives aux questions de gestion des ressources humaines dans la Supply Chain. Prévision, planification des besoins, gestion, protection, amélioration continue, etc.…”
Section: Les Femmes Et Les Hommes : Des « Ressources » Essentielles Pour Accompagner Les Mutations En Logistique Et Supply Chain Managemeunclassified
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.