1998
DOI: 10.1080/0958517970090209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A look at curriculum integration from the bridge

Abstract: This article looks at the popularity of curriculum integration in the 1990s in the United States. It offers evidence from national curriculum standards documents, books in print, journal articles, national coalitions and organizations, and curriculum in use to suggest that curriculum integration is experiencing a peak in interest, much like the early era of progressive education, and the open education movement of the 1960s. It further traces the intellectual roots of the current movement and looks at the conc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
13

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Little consensus is evident on how it should occur or what it should look like, producing an abundance of theories, definitions and models (Hopkins 1937;Jacobs 1989;Fogarty 1991;Vars 1991;Beane 1997). Leading theorists attribute this confusion to a lack of historical understanding of curriculum integration's intellectual roots (Beane 1997;Vars 1997;Gehrke 1998). The integration movement can be traced back to the late nineteenth century in the USA where two distinct and mutually antagonistic factions developed subject-centred and student-centred CI (Dowden 2007(Dowden , 2011.…”
Section: What Is Curriculum Integration?mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Little consensus is evident on how it should occur or what it should look like, producing an abundance of theories, definitions and models (Hopkins 1937;Jacobs 1989;Fogarty 1991;Vars 1991;Beane 1997). Leading theorists attribute this confusion to a lack of historical understanding of curriculum integration's intellectual roots (Beane 1997;Vars 1997;Gehrke 1998). The integration movement can be traced back to the late nineteenth century in the USA where two distinct and mutually antagonistic factions developed subject-centred and student-centred CI (Dowden 2007(Dowden , 2011.…”
Section: What Is Curriculum Integration?mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Interestingly, there is limited research or theorisation on subject-centred CI, perhaps because its traditional discipline structure presents little challenge to existing curriculum designs. Contemporary advocates of the multidisciplinary approach (Jacobs 1989;Fogarty 1991) have been criticised for presenting ahistorical perspectives which have resulted in inadequate theorisation (Wraga 1997;Gehrke 1998).…”
Section: What Is Curriculum Integration?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for over a century a debate has persisted between supporters of the concept of passive learning organized by disciplines and/or subjects, and experiential and social learning organized around themes, problems, and/or content (Beane, 1975.;Gehrke, 2006).…”
Section: Curriculum Integration: a Reform Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gehrke (1998) remarked on the popularity of curriculum integration in the 1990s and demonstrated the increased number of publications devoted to the topic in the period 1990-1997 compared with the decades of the 1970s and the 1980s (see Gehrke 1998, tables 1 and 2). In their historical analysis of integrated curriculum during the last century, Berlin and Lee (2005) focused on science and mathematics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%