2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A longitudinal study of the prevalence and super-shedding of Escherichia coli O157 in dairy heifers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar examples of clonal turnover within a herd have previously been found using both MLVA and PFGE analysis (Lahti et al ., ; LeJeune et al ., ; Sanderson et al ., ; Williams et al ., ). A US study using MLVA (Williams et al ., ) found three distinct types prevalent among a feedlot. Two of these types were found to be prevalent in the early stages of the study before their prevalence waned and the third type took over in the later stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similar examples of clonal turnover within a herd have previously been found using both MLVA and PFGE analysis (Lahti et al ., ; LeJeune et al ., ; Sanderson et al ., ; Williams et al ., ). A US study using MLVA (Williams et al ., ) found three distinct types prevalent among a feedlot. Two of these types were found to be prevalent in the early stages of the study before their prevalence waned and the third type took over in the later stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Biofilms are not static, and the sloughing off of viable bacteria promotes the colonization of downstream environments (Van Houdt and Michiels, 2005). Recent research by Williams et al (2014) has demonstrated that five heifers with multiple super-shedding events also had high number of samples from which E. coli O157:H7 was not detected. Specifically, three of these heifers showed intermittent and infrequent low levels of shedding with clusters of high level of shedding fitting a pattern of clearance and reinfection, consistent with a biofilm-sloughing phenomenon.…”
Section: Defining a Super-sheddermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, changes in management practices such as increased handling, mixing with cohorts, or a change in diet failed to induce a return of the host to a super-shedding state. Williams et al (2014) reported that heifers that were detected as super-shedding were not identifiable as long-term shedders and suggested that the use of ''super-shedding event'' could be a better descriptor of the phenomenon as opposed to the term ''supershedder'' as a reference to a specific animal. A number of factors other than the intermittent nature of shedding of E. coli O157:H7 by feedlot cattle could contribute to variability of shedding, including the feedlot selected, the sampling season, or even year-to-year differences in pathogen prevalence .…”
Section: Super-shedding Of E Coli O157:h7mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of those studies performed on pasture, most have relied on sampling intervals of 51 week [24,25]. A recent study by Williams et al [7] assessed the presence and concentration of E. coli O157 in dairy heifers on pasture over a period of 5 months using weekly sampling intervals. A similar study, performed in beef cattle but using 3-to 7-day intervals identified a distinct pattern associated with E. coli O157 shedding [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%