Many foreign and second language programs place students in streamed classes according to their level of proficiency in the target language in order to allow teachers to better tailor lessons to the ability level of their students. On the other hand, it is argued that in mixed-ability classes, both higher-and lower-proficiency learners can benefit from peer tutoring and that lower-proficiency learners feel less stigmatized. While numerous studies have examined the effects of streaming in other contexts, few studies have been conducted to date within the context of L2 learning. Following a review of the relevant literature, this paper reports the results of a survey exploring the perceptions of first-year university students regarding their learning experiences in streamed and mixed-ability EFL classes. After considering a number of topical issues connected to student effect, the study concludes that there are advantages to streaming for both lower and higher proficiency students.Walqui asserts that "a basic educational principle is that new learning should be based on prior experiences and existing skills" (2000, p. 3). With this in mind, many foreign and second language programs stream students according to their level of ability in the target language (TL). Jones, Harris, and Putt define streaming as "the practice of dividing up a group of students on the basis of previous educational experience or achievement, and subjecting the different subgroups to different educational experiences " (1990, p. 21). Through the creation of relatively homogeneous classes, teachers can more easily design activities that suit the proficiency level of their students (Ansalone, 2003). However, advocates of mixed-proficiency classes believe that teachers can meet the needs of each learner by providing differentiated instruction (Burris & Garrity, 2008), and that students can also be supported in their learning through peer tutoring. It is also argued that streaming may have a stigmatizing effect on lower-proficiency learners, potentially leading to demotivation.
Literature ReviewSocio-affective effects. All groups, whether streamed or multi-level, first go through a "forming" stage during which learners try to find their place in the class "hierarchy" (Dörnyei & Murphey, 2003, p. 14). EFL learners often compare themselves to their peers, "many of whom appear to be more competent and proficient" (Dörnyei & Murphey, 2003, p. 15). We might expect, then, that this forming stage would be more stressful for lower-proficiency learners in mixed-ability classes who find themselves working alongside highly proficient classmates. Yet at the same time, stronger students may conceal their more advanced skills for fear of being viewed as show-offs or "nerds" (Dörnyei & Murphey, 2003, p. 36). Students may affect a strong L1 accent, since speaking like a native speaker may be viewed as a sign of no longer belonging to one's L1 peer group (Walqui, 2000;Lefkowitz & Hedgcock, 2002).One argument often made against streaming is that students...