2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10926-005-0873-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Longitudinal Study of Industrial and Clerical Workers: Incidence of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Assessment of Risk Factors

Abstract: This study followed workers over an extended period of time to identify factors which may influence the onset of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS). The purpose was to evaluate incidence of CTS and to create a predictive model of factors that play a role in the development of CTS. This prospective study followed 432 industrial and clerical workers over 5.4 years. Incident cases were defined as workers who had no prior history of CTS at baseline testing and were diagnosed with CTS during the follow-up period or at th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
75
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nathan and his colleagues found 34 incident CTS cases among 256 industrial workers during an 11-year follow-up, resulting in an estimated incidence of 12.0 per 1000 person-years (45). In the prospective study of Gell et al (35) among 432 industrial and clerical workers with an average follow-up of 5.4 years, a similar incidence of 12.4 per 1000 person-years was observed. Given this low incidence, cohort studies with a low exposure prevalence will be strongly underpowered with respect to demonstrating significant associations, even with OR values of 2.0 or higher, unless very large populations are studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nathan and his colleagues found 34 incident CTS cases among 256 industrial workers during an 11-year follow-up, resulting in an estimated incidence of 12.0 per 1000 person-years (45). In the prospective study of Gell et al (35) among 432 industrial and clerical workers with an average follow-up of 5.4 years, a similar incidence of 12.4 per 1000 person-years was observed. Given this low incidence, cohort studies with a low exposure prevalence will be strongly underpowered with respect to demonstrating significant associations, even with OR values of 2.0 or higher, unless very large populations are studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In eight studies, no significant differences were observed, the OR values ranging from 0.91 to 1.63 (33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40). Jobs with the highest increased occurrence of CTS included work in the meatand fish-processing industry (OR 76.5), forestry work with chain saws (OR 21.3), and electronic assembly work (OR 11.4).…”
Section: Job Title and Carpal Tunnel Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correspondence has been moderate, even though the strain index identified more hazardous jobs than the HAL method (74,75). An association with upper-limb disorders has been seen in several cross-sectional studies (75,78,83,84) as well as in prospective longitudinal studies (85)(86)(87)(88)(89)(90). The intra-and inter-observer repeatability has been moderate to good (82,91).…”
Section: The American Conference Of Governmental Industrial Hygienistmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Among earlier studies of the work-relatedness of CTS, many had small sample sizes, used varying definitions of CTS, and did not consistently account for known personal risk factors such as increasing age, high body mass index (BMI), and comorbid diseases such as diabetes mellitus.8, 9 Similarly, numerous recent studies characterizing the personal factors associated with CTS have not adequately measured or analyzed occupational factors.8, [10][11][12] Other recent studies have shown that both personal and occupational factors are independently associated with CTS. [13][14][15] Evaluating the independent contributions of occupational versus nonoccupational risk factors for CTS has implications for prevention, treatment, and for medical-legal issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%