2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01267.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A longitudinal observational study of preference for elective caesarean section among nulliparous Hong Kong Chinese women

Abstract: Objective To establish whether women's preference for elective caesarean section (ELCS) changes as gestation advances.Design A prospective longitudinal observational study.Setting Two units providing obstetric care in Hong Kong, one public and one private.Sample Five hundred and one nulliparous Chinese pregnant women attending their routine fetal anomaly scan in either unit.Methods Consented subjects had two interviews using a structured questionnaire at 18-22 weeks and 35-37 weeks of gestation, respectively. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
60
4
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
60
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most published papers have surveyed a variety of clinicians on their opinions about request for primary elective caesarean section, why they would agree to or refuse such a request and their practice patterns. 14,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]29,30 There has been a questionnaire-based survey of women's views on elective caesarean section, 31 a longitudinal observational study to establish whether preference for elective caesarean section changes as gestation advances 32 and a critical review of the literature on request for caesarean section. 33 To our knowledge, this study is the first published paper to evaluate utility scores for the potential risks of VD, to compare women's and clinicians' views and to quantify the particular factors that would prompt a woman to request a primary elective caesarean section.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most published papers have surveyed a variety of clinicians on their opinions about request for primary elective caesarean section, why they would agree to or refuse such a request and their practice patterns. 14,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]29,30 There has been a questionnaire-based survey of women's views on elective caesarean section, 31 a longitudinal observational study to establish whether preference for elective caesarean section changes as gestation advances 32 and a critical review of the literature on request for caesarean section. 33 To our knowledge, this study is the first published paper to evaluate utility scores for the potential risks of VD, to compare women's and clinicians' views and to quantify the particular factors that would prompt a woman to request a primary elective caesarean section.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The women can also have a wish to deliver on a "good day" according to cultural beliefs [23]. In Asian countries, the partner's preference as well as that of the mother in law, also significantly influenced their choice [24].…”
Section: Cs Birth Preferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lack of knowledge about childbirth, a negative image of giving birth and incorrect information cause fear, and this leads to women requesting a cesarean birth [12]. Other factors in the choice of a cesarean section are the idea that it is safer or healthier [7,9,10], avoiding damage to the body [6,9], the idea that it is safer for the baby [6,7], a recommendation by the doctor or midwife [8,13], planning the time of birth [8,10], and making a return to sexual activity easier [14] as well as if the doctor who is assisting at the birth is male [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The reasons that women choose a vaginal birth include a quicker recovery, the idea that it is healthier for the mother and baby [7,8,10,16], it allows breast-feeding sooner [7,14], it is more natural [7,8,16], it leads to a quicker discharge from hospital [10,14,17], it is less risky [10], and it is on the advice of the doctor or midwife [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation