As computer science (CS) quickly gains ground in K-12 classrooms, CS education research (CSER) is also rapidly growing. It remains unclear, however, the extent to which this growth in research captures key equity-focused areas. In this article, we describe a pilot test to determine the feasibility of using the CAPE theoretical framework to identify coverage of equity-focused CSER. The Capacity, Access, Participation and Experience (CAPE) framework examines the capacity to offer CS education, learner access to CS education, learner participation in CS education (enrollment) and experiences learners have when learning CS. We started with one primary research question: How feasible is it to use the CAPE framework for identify coverage gaps in K-12 CS education research?We then created a secondary research question for narrowing down the set of articles examined and testing its feasiblity: What are the gaps in research focused on K-12 CS education in which girls are participants in the studies?. We chose to use an existing, publicly-available dataset of 800+ articles and examined studies in which only girls were participants (n=51), then examined each of the 51 articles to determine which key CAPE component(s) each covers. Our pilot results show that CSER among girls covers areas related to Experience (92%) and Capacity (59%), but little to no coverage in the areas of Access (0%) and Participation (2%) of girls.To answer the primary research question and determine the feasibility of using CAPE for analyzing the entire corpus of 800+ articles (which is the next step in our research plan), we evaluated feasibility across two key areas, implementation and practicality, and found both to be satisfactory. This study is important in understanding how to identify areas of equity covered in K-12 CS education research and areas that need more attention in order to build a broader set of research knowledge for identifying promising practices for all learners.