A long‐term perspective on entrepreneurial strategies and their impact on British road policy

Abstract

The case study presented in this paper combines citation and discourse network analyses to explore entrepreneurial strategies and their long-term impact on public policy. The analysis draws on and develops previously published research that documents entrepreneurial influences on British road policy since the 1980s. Drawing in particular upon evidence presented in the 2013 Action for Roads White Paper, we conclude that it is not enough to focus research on a policy entrepreneur's capacity to mobilize a majority for policy change through skillful leadership and the strategic use of expertise and social capital to gain the expected benefits.Studies must also take into account the fact that once influential individuals may still impact legislation in an advisory capacity by focusing resources on a particular arena. More importantly, this strategy can, in the long term, explain why British road policy tends to remain relatively stable. K E Y W O R D Scitation analysis, entrepreneurial strategies, expertise, policy entrepreneur, policy impact

Relational coupling of multiple streams: The case of COVID‐19 infections in German abattoirs

“…Other studies refine the types of actors being part of a discourse network (Bandelow & Hornung, 2019) and even grant them the role of policy entrepreneurs (Buckton et al, 2019) intended in relational coupling. Recent research has paved the way for DNA applications in the MSF by investigating the persistence of previously influential entrepreneurs in British road policy (Witting & Dudley, 2020) or by studying the engagement of entrepreneurs in different issues in Swiss water policy (Brandenberger et al, 2020).…”

Why we need to study street‐level policy entrepreneurs

“…Policy entrepreneurship is not limited to a specific policy area, formal institutional venue, or informal institutional setting. Research on policy entrepreneurs considers how individuals engage with the policy process, acting independently or in teams (Mintrom et al, 2014), to introduce policy innovations and attempt to achieve policy change (Arieli & Cohen, 2013; Arnold, 2021a; Mintrom, 1997, 2000; Mintrom & Norman, 2009; Navot & Cohen, 2015; Petridou, 2018; Sætren, 2016; Witting & Dudley, 2020). A recent systematic review of 229 studies (Frisch‐Aviram et al, 2020) reveals that policy entrepreneurs are present in a large number of national contexts and in various policy domains; they come from the public, private, and third sectors; and they try to affect policy at various governmental levels.…”

Elites, bureaucrats, and entrepreneurship in policy processes

“…Given the diverging degree of institutionalization in France and Germany, there is a greater role of individual medical entrepreneur strategies in France as opposed to Germany, as interest intermediation is much more institutionalized and collectively organized in Germany. Entrepreneurial strategies are equally analyzed in the article by Witting and Dudley (2020). By empirically investigating the stability of British road policy, they find that policy entrepreneurs do not only push a policy proposal until its eventual adoption, but that they can equally have a long‐term influence on legislation by using their resources, knowledge, and social contacts to prevent and decelerate proposals.…”