A Long-Term Outcome Assessment of the Effects on Subsequent Reoffense Rates of a Prison-Based CBT/RNR Sex Offender Treatment Program With Strength-Based Elements

Abstract

This article describes an evaluation of the effects of an early version (1991-2001) of Rockwood’s prison-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/Risk–Needs–Responsivity (CBT/RNR) sex offender program that had emerging elements of a strength-based approach. This program was implemented under contract to Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) and continued to evolve in response to emerging evidence until it closed in 2013. Thus, the program as evaluated here did not involve a fixed approach as did the comparison CSC program (hereafter referred to as SOTP). Long-term reoffense data, from Rockwood’s program ( n = 579), were compared with SOTP ( n = 625) and with a group of untreated men ( n = 107) sentenced for sex offenses. A modified brief actuarial risk scale (BARS-M) was used to control for baseline risk among the three groups, along with additional controls for age at release, victim type, and individual differences in the length of long-term follow-up period. Both treatment groups displayed lower rates of both sexual and violent reoffending when compared with the no-treatment offenders. Overall, the Rockwood program generated the lowest recidivism rates. The results demonstrate that prison-based sex offense–specific treatment can be effective. We discuss the strengths and limitations of the current design through the Collaborative Outcome Data Committee’s guidelines.

Mandated or Voluntary Treatment of Men Who Committed Child Sexual Abuse: Is There a Difference?

“…According to Hanson et al (17) these principles "should be a major consideration in the design and implementation of treatment programs for sexual offenders" (17) (p. 865). Consequently, different treatment providers around the world have been using them for their conception of sexualforensic psychotherapy (16,(18)(19)(20). The RNR-principles can be defined as follows (21):…”

Returning Citizens and Point of Entry: Is There a Match?

“…This focus on a strengths-based model in terms of treatment has thrived in social work, but has not been used as much within criminal justice populations. Of those studies that have examined strengths-based approaches to correctional programming and reentry initiatives, research suggests that these interventions are effective in terms of rehabilitation and the social reintegration of formerly incarcerated individuals (Bazemore & Erbe, 2004; Berghuis, 2018; Hunter et al, 2016; Maruna, 2001; Oliver et al, 2020; Saleebey, 2008). Social work can and should take the lead to transform transition planning models to use this model as a foundation for programs.…”

From Research to Practice: Designing a Treatment Program for Individuals Convicted of Child Sexual Exploitation Material

“…Today, correctional facilities in most developed countries recognize the value in rehabilitation and helping incarcerated individuals live a law-abiding life following their release from prison. The extensive work of Gendreau and colleagues 11,53 , and replicated across independent investigators 12,13 , is paramount in showing that punishment alone does not reduce crime, but rather that on average, rehabilitation does reduce recidivism, at least to a modest degree. Moreover, rehabilitative outcomes are enhanced with programs that adhere to Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) principles 14 .…”