2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2006.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A long-term copper exposure on freshwater ecosystem using lotic mesocosms: Primary producer community responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
38
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
38
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were observed using lotic mesocosms in which the only variable parameter was the concentration of metal (copper), whereas other parameters (the initial primary producer community and water chemistry) were identical [16]. Some taxa of the natural primary producer community (phytoplankton, periphyton and macrophytes) seemed to be sensitive to copper.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Similar results were observed using lotic mesocosms in which the only variable parameter was the concentration of metal (copper), whereas other parameters (the initial primary producer community and water chemistry) were identical [16]. Some taxa of the natural primary producer community (phytoplankton, periphyton and macrophytes) seemed to be sensitive to copper.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…As previously shown, the 4-week Cu exposure strongly reduced total and algal biomass ( [Barranguet et al, 2003] , and [Serra and Guasch, 2009] ) and triggered a marked shift in the algal community structure ( [Soldo and Behra, 2000] , [Guasch et al, 2002] , [Roussel et al, 2007] , [Serra and Guasch, 2009] and ). It led to a significant increase in green algae fraction and a decrease in diatom fraction, while no change was observed in the proportion of cyanobacteria.…”
Section: Recovery Of Phototrophic Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…It is assumed that heavier fish for a given length is in better condition and able to indicate fish fitness under metabolic stress caused by pollution; as trade-off it is required deal to detoxification and the energy available for growth may thus be reduced. CF in fish is known to decline upon exposure to heavy metal (Roussel et al, 2007;Bervoets et al, 2009), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) (Khan, 2003). Furthermore, condition factor can vary seasonally, being directly associated with food availability (Le Cren, 1951;Bolger & Connolly, 1989;Braga & Andrade, 2005;Sudarshan & Kulkarni, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%