2017
DOI: 10.2495/tdi-v1-n3-329-338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A long-term analysis of passenger flows on a regional rail line

Abstract: Promoting rail systems can represent a useful policy for rebalancing modal choices and reducing private car use, especially in high density contexts. Obviously, an increase in passenger numbers is only possible if generalised costs (i.e. a weighted sum of times and monetary costs) associated to public transport are abated. According to the recent literature and current professional practice, most strategies for achieving this objective are based only on infrastructural interventions which may be unfeasible or … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, the procedure is carried out for any of the considered confidence levels. The travel demand was estimated by means of traditional approaches proposed in the literature (details on the travel demand estimation in the case of the analyzed line may be found in [74,75]. Likewise, we adopted the commercial software OPENTRACK [76] as train movement simulator.…”
Section: Application To a Real Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, the procedure is carried out for any of the considered confidence levels. The travel demand was estimated by means of traditional approaches proposed in the literature (details on the travel demand estimation in the case of the analyzed line may be found in [74,75]. Likewise, we adopted the commercial software OPENTRACK [76] as train movement simulator.…”
Section: Application To a Real Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…finally, further studies could profitably investigate effects in terms of OD (i.e. origin-destination) matrix estimation (see, for instance, caropreso et al [36], cascetta et al [37], Di mauro et al [38]) by means of flow counts in the event of adopting the two different behavioural approaches.…”
Section: Conclusion and Research Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…through the EU guidelines), reducing the risk of planning fallacy; however, CBAs tend to underestimate non-monetary impacts (externalities). For example, there are environmental impacts, landscape impacts and the social impact [4]- [7]. On the contrary, the MCA is more suitable for non-users and non-monetary impact estimation, but there are no national and/or EU official guidelines: This does not allow standardization of procedures, increasing the risk of planning fallacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%