2021
DOI: 10.17506/18179568_2021_18_2_142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Logically Formalized Axiomatic Epistemology System Ksi Modeling Kant’s Extraordinary Statement of Physicist’s Prescribing A-Priori Laws to Nature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, I mean the psychologically surprising theorem-schemes (Aα ⊃ (α ↔ Gα)) and (Aα ⊃ ( α ↔ Gα)), which are formally-logically provable in the formal axiomatic theory Σ+V, along with the psychologically unexpected theorem-scheme (Aα ⊃ (α ↔ α)). Formal proofs of these psychologically odd theorem-schemes are already published in [40] [41] [55] [74]. In the indicated triple of theorem-schemes (which are the implications), generally speaking, the consequents are false, but in that very rare (extraordinary) particular case, when it is true that Aα, the implications are true and formally provable in Σ+V.…”
Section: Recognizing and Exploiting A "Mole Hole" For Formalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, I mean the psychologically surprising theorem-schemes (Aα ⊃ (α ↔ Gα)) and (Aα ⊃ ( α ↔ Gα)), which are formally-logically provable in the formal axiomatic theory Σ+V, along with the psychologically unexpected theorem-scheme (Aα ⊃ (α ↔ α)). Formal proofs of these psychologically odd theorem-schemes are already published in [40] [41] [55] [74]. In the indicated triple of theorem-schemes (which are the implications), generally speaking, the consequents are false, but in that very rare (extraordinary) particular case, when it is true that Aα, the implications are true and formally provable in Σ+V.…”
Section: Recognizing and Exploiting A "Mole Hole" For Formalmentioning
confidence: 99%