1993
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-56804-2_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A logical reconstruction of constraint relaxation hierarchies in logic programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, we could attach the function symbol plus for a first-order language to the LISP function +. When the term plus (3,4) is encountered during the deduction process, the LISP program (+ 3 4) would be executed to evaluate it directly. Predicate evaluation has come to be referred to as procedural attachment.…”
Section: Interlayer Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an example, we could attach the function symbol plus for a first-order language to the LISP function +. When the term plus (3,4) is encountered during the deduction process, the LISP program (+ 3 4) would be executed to evaluate it directly. Predicate evaluation has come to be referred to as procedural attachment.…”
Section: Interlayer Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization and relaxation (see, for example, [3,12,33]) are two important operations that naturally arise in many applications involving constraints, e.g., engineering design, scheduling, decision support, etc. In optimization, we are interested in finding the optimal (i.e., best) solutions to a set of constraints with respect to an objective function.…”
Section: Negotiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization and relaxation (see, e.g., [2,9]) are two important operations that naturally arise in many applications involving constraints, e.g., engineering design, scheduling, decision support, etc. In optimization, we are interested in finding the optimal (i.e., best) solutions to a set of constraints with respect to an objective function.…”
Section: Negotiationmentioning
confidence: 99%