2010 - Milcom 2010 Military Communications Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1109/milcom.2010.5680465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A location-dependent runs-and-gaps model for predicting TCP performance over a UAV wireless channel

Abstract: In this paper, we use a finite-state model to predict the performance of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) over a varying wireless channel between an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and ground nodes. As a UAV traverses its flight path, the wireless channel may experience periods of significant packet loss, successful packet delivery, and intermittent reception. By capturing packet run-length and gap-length statistics at various locations on the flight path, this locationdependent model can predict TCP thro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that the links are intermediate in their qualities for a significant amount of time, owing to the UAV moving in and out of range frequently; this might be a property specific to fixed-wing craft, but is important nonetheless as those make up the most efficient class of fliers. As a result, network layer protocols will need to be adapted to cope with this situation, or to work on top of link layer mechanisms which use, e.g., coding or retransmissions to mask the loss [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that the links are intermediate in their qualities for a significant amount of time, owing to the UAV moving in and out of range frequently; this might be a property specific to fixed-wing craft, but is important nonetheless as those make up the most efficient class of fliers. As a result, network layer protocols will need to be adapted to cope with this situation, or to work on top of link layer mechanisms which use, e.g., coding or retransmissions to mask the loss [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the periodic full-and intermediate-loss regions resulting from the circulatory flight pattern will be an important factor in UAV network protocol design, especially with use of legacy protocols such as Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) [6], [7] which are sensitive to packet loss patterns. Secondly, the significant presence of intermediate loss regions (16.1-18.6% in Table II) indicates that we could obtain substantial gains through the use of receiver diversity, provided that the losses at different receivers are generally not correlated.…”
Section: A Baseline Single-receiver Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two extremes are sometimes blended by locationbased statistical models [17,18]. However, we find that location information is generally a poor predictor of individual packet losses.…”
Section: Predictive Link-state Modelingmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…1 For a more detailed description of a similar campaign, see [4]. We graciously acknowledge those contributing researchers and engineers for their role in these experiments, including Chit-Kwan Lin, Dario Vlah, Dan Hague, Mike Muccio, Brendan Poland, Bob Gorman, and Jason Cassulis and the new channel observation:…”
Section: A Classification-based Gap Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical link models in the literature include applications of Markov chains to capture the first and second order statistics for 802.11 and GSM networks [3], [4], [5], and latent variable Gaussian processes to map location-based signal strength statistics [6]. However, these methods are not well suited to capturing predictive correlations that span many packet times; the number of Markov chain state transitions that must be trained explodes with the length of link state sequences, and physical drivers of packet loss like occlusions violate Gaussian assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%