2006
DOI: 10.1021/ja055313e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Localized Specific Interaction Alters the Unfolding Pathways of Structural Homologues

Abstract: Reductive unfolding studies of proteins are designed to provide information about intramolecular interactions that govern the formation (and stabilization) of the native state and about folding/ unfolding pathways. By mutating Tyr92 to G, A, or L in the model protein, bovine pancreatic ribonuclease A, and through analysis of temperature factors and molecular dynamics simulations of the crystal structures of these mutants, it is demonstrated that the markedly different reductive unfolding rates and pathways of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, this value is significantly smaller than the Gibbs free energy of global protein unfolding which is reported to be in the range 18-40 kJ mol 21 (Refs. 3,4,32,33). On the other hand, the value of DG 0 derived for BSA is about 2.6 times lower than that reported for the two least reactive S-S bridges in BPTI 31 thus suggesting that the disulfide bridges in BSA are on average more exposed to the solvent.…”
Section: Reaction Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…As expected, this value is significantly smaller than the Gibbs free energy of global protein unfolding which is reported to be in the range 18-40 kJ mol 21 (Refs. 3,4,32,33). On the other hand, the value of DG 0 derived for BSA is about 2.6 times lower than that reported for the two least reactive S-S bridges in BPTI 31 thus suggesting that the disulfide bridges in BSA are on average more exposed to the solvent.…”
Section: Reaction Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The 30–75 disulfide bond in Onconase is more solvent exposed that other disulfide bonds in this enzyme or in RNase A (Narayan et al, 2004). Therefore, the reduction rate of this bond is10 3 -fold greater than that of the analogous 40–95 bond in RNase A (Xu et al, 2006). This disulfide bond substantially contributes to the enzyme stability since the des(30–75) folding intermediate (Gahl and Scheraga, 2009) and a recombinant variant, with Ala residues replacing Cys30 and Cys75 (Torrent et al, 2008) are less stable (T m values approximately 71°C).…”
Section: Onconase and Amphinase From Rana Pipiensmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, until now, only the T form in the space group P3 2 21 was reported from salt solutions except for the crystal of RNase A in the liganded form or a mutant [24,25].…”
Section: Comparison Of Intermolecular Interactions In the M And T Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%