2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A local transient feature extraction method via periodic low rank dynamic mode decomposition for bearing incipient fault diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, a robust tensor low rank component extraction framework is constructed in MDMD for simultaneous extraction of bearing fault features from the multivariate signal, which enhance the noise robustness of the proposed method. In our previous work [33], we have verified that the fault features are low rank distributed in the dynamical system matrix. As the multivariate extension of traditional DMD algorithm, multivariate fault features are also low rank distributed in the dynamical system tensor (DST).…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Then, a robust tensor low rank component extraction framework is constructed in MDMD for simultaneous extraction of bearing fault features from the multivariate signal, which enhance the noise robustness of the proposed method. In our previous work [33], we have verified that the fault features are low rank distributed in the dynamical system matrix. As the multivariate extension of traditional DMD algorithm, multivariate fault features are also low rank distributed in the dynamical system tensor (DST).…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…To validate the effectiveness of the presented algorithm, rubbing fault simulation signals y (t) were first constructed to simulate rubbing faults. The transient characteristics of the rubbing fault signals can be considered as periodic pulses submerged in noise and interference [30]. In this paper, y 1 (t) represents the feature frequency of rubbing failure and its integer multiple frequency components; y 2 (t) represents the j/2 (j = 1,2,4,5,7,8) fractional multiple frequency components of rubbing fault characteristic frequency; y 3 (t) represents the j/3 (j = 1,2,4,5,7,8) fractional multiple frequency components of rubbing fault characteristic frequency; and y 4 (t) represents the rotational frequency.…”
Section: Simulation Signals Of Rubbing Faultmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, low-rank representation has been widely used in PHM [32][33][34][35]; see Li [36] for a recent comprehensive review. However, it is found that LRSR-based transfer subspace learning has not been investigated in the field of fault diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%