Advanced Robotics: 1989 1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-83957-3_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Local Solution with Global Characteristics for the Joint Torque Optimization of a Redundant Manipulator

Abstract: In this article, a stable local solution with global characteristics is developed for the joint torque optimization problem in redundant robotic manipulators. It is shown that the local optimization of the inertia inverse weighted dynamic torque corresponds to the global kinetic energy minimization problem. The proposed local-global alternative to the joint torque optimization problem is compared for stability and torque optimality with five different methods used for redundancy resolution of robotic manipulat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, with joint physical limits considered, the MTN redundancyresolution scheme (4)- (8) 2) Inertia-Inverse Weighted Torque (IWT) Scheme: As analyzed via calculus of variations [4], the IWT scheme may result in resolutions with global characteristics. That is, the solution to the minimization of ; s:t: G k (; t) = 0; k = 1; .…”
Section: ) Minimum Torque Norm (Mtn) Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, with joint physical limits considered, the MTN redundancyresolution scheme (4)- (8) 2) Inertia-Inverse Weighted Torque (IWT) Scheme: As analyzed via calculus of variations [4], the IWT scheme may result in resolutions with global characteristics. That is, the solution to the minimization of ; s:t: G k (; t) = 0; k = 1; .…”
Section: ) Minimum Torque Norm (Mtn) Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other secondary criteria are: obstacle avoidance (Klein and Kee 1989), joint torque optimization (Honegger and Codourey 1998, Noble 1975, Sciavicco and Siciliano 1987, joint velocity constraints (Beiner 1999, Cleary and Tesar 1990, Martin et al 1989, Nedungadi and Kazerounian 1989, energy minimization (Beiner 1999, Chan and Dubey 1995, Klein 1985, manipulator precision (Klein 1985), speed of operation (Chan and Dubey 1995), joint limit avoidance , maximization of various end-effector dexterity measures (Klein and Kee 1989), multiple performance criteria , Erikson and Thor 1999, Nedungadi 1987, global optimization and global versus local optimization. Additional information about redundant manipulators can be found in Siciliano (1990).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early manipulator placement methods were based upon ideas such as the time-optimality of a workcell layout [5] and workcell agility, the ability to effectively perform several manufacturing tasks with minimal re-tooling time and expense [6]. These methods showed promise in increasing factory production and lowering production costs, but were applicable mainly to non-redundant manipulators in workcells where all machine locations, except for the manipulator locations, are pre-defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%