2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A local phase based invariant feature for remote sensing image matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these detectors usually have difficulty in detecting highly repeatable feature points between multispectral images for the difference of gradient, which substantially degrades the matching performance [24]. Compared with the image gradient, PC model is more robust to changes in illumination and contrast, many researchers have used PC detector [25]- [27] for feature detection. Ye et al [25] proposed a feature detector (MMPC-Lap) and a feature descriptor named local histogram of orientated phase congruency (LHOPC) for remote sensing image matching, which is invariant to illumination and contrast variation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, these detectors usually have difficulty in detecting highly repeatable feature points between multispectral images for the difference of gradient, which substantially degrades the matching performance [24]. Compared with the image gradient, PC model is more robust to changes in illumination and contrast, many researchers have used PC detector [25]- [27] for feature detection. Ye et al [25] proposed a feature detector (MMPC-Lap) and a feature descriptor named local histogram of orientated phase congruency (LHOPC) for remote sensing image matching, which is invariant to illumination and contrast variation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gray distortion caused by the nonlinear intensity difference is a great challenge to the multispectral image matching. Through research on image matching, some researchers found that the geometric structure information between multispectral images is more stable than gradients or intensities information under nonlinear intensity variation in multispectral images [20], [24], [25]. Based on this observation, feature points can be detected based on the structure consistency of image, which can be evaluated by calculating similarity metrics on structure or shape descriptors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The system accuracy is computed at equal error rate (EER) value which reflects the maximum system performance when the false acceptance rate (FAR) equals to the false rejection rate (FRR) as explained in 15. The error distance between x ̅ and y ̅ with m+1 length can be described in (16)(17)(18) [30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, because of the stability of the satellite platform and geolocation tools, the affine transformation model is able local geometric distortions [21] and the histogram of orientated phase congruency (HOPC) descriptor was developed to address the nonlinear radiometric differences [22]. To address the poor distribution of detected features, novel score criteria for the feature points, a feature detection method based on phase congruency, and the uniform partitioning strategy were utilized to generate an adequate number of high-quality, uniformly-distributed point features in the spatial and scale spaces, such as UR-SIFT [23], UC-SIFT [24], and MMPC-Lap [25]. For feature matching, a support-line descriptor based on multiple adaptive binning gradient histograms was developed to filter out the outliers after the initial matching [26] to produce more high-precision correspondences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%