A living mapping review for COVID-19 funded research projects: nine-month update

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in an unprecedented research response, demonstrating exceptional examples of rapid research and collaboration. There is however a need for greater coordination, with limited resources and the shifting global nature of the pandemic resulting in a proliferation of research projects underpowered and unable to achieve their aims. Methods: The UK Collaborative on Development Research (UKCDR) and Global Research Collaboration for Infectious Disease Preparedness (GloPID-R), two funder coordination groups have collaborated to develop a live database of funded research projects across the world relating to COVID-19. Drawing data continually from their members and further global funding bodies, as of 15th April 2021 the database contains 10,608 projects, funded by 201 funders, taking place across 142 countries representing an investment of at least $4.7 billion. To our knowledge it is one of the most comprehensive databases. The database is aligned to the World Health Organisation and GloPID-R Global Research Roadmap: 2019 Novel Coronavirus. It is being used by the WHO, governments and multi-lateral policy makers, research funders and researchers. This living mapping review aims to supplement the database by providing an open accessible and frequently updated resource summarising the characteristics of the COVID-19 funded research portfolio. Both descriptive and thematic analysis will be presented and updated frequently to aid interpretation of the global COVID-19 funded research portfolio. Results: In this version four analysis we provide an updated detailed descriptive analysis of the database (three months after version three) and focus our thematic analysis on research gaps, research areas in need of coordination, study populations and research locations (with a focus on resource-limited countries). Conclusions: As the global funding response to COVID-19 plateaus, this living mapping review helps both funders and researchers to prioritise resources to areas where there is continued unmet research need.

Between division and connection: a qualitative study of the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on social relationships in the United Kingdom

“…When implemented at scale, these measures result in what is commonly known as a “lockdown”. While NPIs are evidenced to be effective at reducing COVID-19 transmission, mortality and healthcare demand ( Doung-Ngern et al , 2020 ; Ferguson et al , 2020 ; Flaxman et al , 2020 ; Koo et al , 2020 ), little social science research has been published on the psychosocial impact of lockdowns on the public ( Kittel et al , 2020 ; Norton et al , 2020a ), despite this being identified as a global priority research area ( Holmes et al , 2020 ; Norton et al , 2020b ; World Health Organization ).…”

Saving millions of lives but some resources squandered: emerging lessons from health research system pandemic achievements and challenges

“…One approach has been to focus on funders and attempt to identify the total number of research projects they funded and the amounts they allocated. In an inevitably challenging exercise, with Chinese data particularly difficult to secure, a UK and Canadian team created a global living mapping review of COVID-19 funded research projects [130]. Focusing on public and philanthropic funding, it found that the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada had the largest numbers of funded projects, with the same order for the amount of funding, except that in some editions Germany provided the third highest level.…”

Research Trends on the Application of Information Technologies and Digital Innovations during Covid-19 Pandemic

“…The Global Coronavirus Innovation Map, Treatment and Vaccine Tracker, The COVID-19 Health Funding Tracker and many more. The large-scale application of various intervention measures was achieved by developing several digital IT applications and digital innovations with the aim of establishing a sustainable and effective method for reducing the risk of transmission and reaching optimal intervention and prevention strategies [22]. Furthermore, in the area of infection screening, artificial intelligence (AI), thermal cameras, and various smartphone applications were utilized in China, Taiwan, Singapore, and Iceland.…”