A literature review on innovation management tools

Cagnazzo, Luca; Taticchi, Paolo; Botarelli, Marco

doi:10.5902/19834659620

Cited by 7 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 39 publications

(37 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The importance of the role of users in innovation was discussed at a greater length by Bogers et al (2010). In their literature review study, Cagnazzo et al (2008) stressed that firms appear not only to react to but to enact changes in the economy. They classified the reviewed studies into three groups, the first containing papers in the area of innovation, the second containing papers on milestones of the innovation process and the third containing papers in the area of innovation models.…”

Section: Innovation Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of research on innovation in hospitality and tourism

Gomezelj

2016

IJCHM

364

309

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the state of academic research on innovation in tourism. The authors present a systematic review of the literature, different research approaches and perspectives on tourism innovation; offer a synthesis of our findings and provide a discussion and proposals for future research. Design/methodology/approach Existing studies on innovation in hospitality and tourism (included in the Web of Knowledge database) were reviewed, and their limitations were identified. A procedure used in previous studies (Crossan and Apaydin, 2010; Tranfield et al., 2003; Becheikh et al., 2006) was applied. Moreover, aiming to reveal theoretical foundations of tourism innovation research and identify their structure, a bibliometric analysis was performed. Findings This paper identifies 152 published papers that represent the major efforts in expanding the body of research on innovation in hospitality and tourism. The importance of innovation for business and regional competitiveness and success has been recognised by both researchers and practitioners. In the papers included in the sample of this paper, the authors identified a general consensus that much remains to be done in the development of the theory of innovation in tourism. Through bibliometric analysis, nine co-citation networks, or clusters, were retrieved by applying co-citation relations among the most cited authors. The examination of these nine clusters revealed some dominant themes that characterise the field. Research limitations/implications The authors used three databases: Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) and Arts & Humanities Citation Index. While these databases may not include all relevant research, the authors, nonetheless, believe that by using a rigorous procedure in reviewing the literature systematically, they were able to reduce the probability of neglecting any information that would critically change the content of the present paper. Practical implications The aim of this paper was to bring together the prior research with presently existing models that may be used in further research. For the continuation of the research, the authors propose additional studies with the aim of theory development. By introducing new theoretical ideas and theoretical models, more qualitative and inductive research would help to stimulate further work. As stated above, researchers could go further by undertaking quantitative methods to empirically verify the theoretically proposed models. Originality/value Since the last review (Hjalager, 2010) of past studies in tourism innovation, mostly focusing on studies up to 2009, tourism innovation research has grown noticeably in terms of diverse topics. In this paper’s database, the year with the most publications was 2012 with 48 papers, followed by 2014 with 42 (by 19 September), 2010 and 2011 with 41 and 2009 with 29. To the authors’ knowledge, no updated reviews focusing on innovation in tourism have been published recently. This study, consisting of a systematic review of academic literature, includes analyses of the international context, the methodology used, the points of view, the level of analysis (micro-level, macro-level and general level) and the type of innovation discussed in the paper. Moreover, the authors did not find any studies that used bibliometric analysis to identify the structure of the theoretical foundation of research in the area of innovation in tourism.

show abstract

Section: Innovation Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of research on innovation in hospitality and tourism

Gomezelj

2016

IJCHM

364

309

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Given the short lifecycles of products in this market, the bureau aims to produce a new product idea every day as part of a "disruptive innovation strategy" (Cagnazzo et al (2008). From the GCMB's perspective:…”

Section: Organisational Innovativeness Influencing Innovation In Glasgow City Marketing Bureaumentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaborative innovation: catalyst for a destination’s event success

Schofield

Crowther

Jago

et al. 2018

IJCHM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This paper aims to contribute to theory concerning collaborative innovation through stakeholder engagement with reference to Glasgow City Marketing Bureau’s (GCMB’s) management strategies, which represent UK best practice in events procurement, leveraging and destination branding. Design/methodology/approach The research adopts a case study design to facilitate an in-depth evaluation of the destination marketing organisation’s (DMO’s) critical success factors. Multiple perspectives on GCMB’s collaborative innovation are achieved through semi-structured interviews with senior managers from the bureau, key stakeholders and other DMOs. Findings GCMB’s success results from long-term, extensive, collaborative engagement, a unique institutional structure and sustained political and financial support through to transformational leadership, strategic event selection and targeted marketing through “earned” distribution channels. Research limitations/implications The study takes a single case study approach and focusses on GCMB’s event-led branding strategy. Given the importance but relative neglect of long-term inter-personal relationships in collaborative innovation, future research should focus on the development of social capital and adopt a longitudinal perspective. Practical implications The paper provides insights into the collaborative innovation process with a range of stakeholders, which underpins GCMB’s events strategy and its leveraging of the city brand. In particular, the study highlights the need for entrepreneurial leadership and the development of long-term relationships for effective engagement with stakeholders. Originality/value Previous research has focussed on outcomes and neglected pre-requisites and the process of collaborative innovation between destination stakeholders. This study examines this issue from the perspective of a successful DMO and presents a conceptual framework and new engagement dimensions that address this gap in knowledge.

show abstract

“…Mais tarde, Beuren (2000) definiu a inovação como um processo em que uma pessoa ou um grupo de pessoas cria uma ideia e a implementa com algum valor agregado para a organização. Para Cagnazzo et al (2008), por outro lado, a inovação é o encontro entre uma necessidade de mercado e uma tecnologia ou modelo de negócio que cria valor tanto para a empresa como para os seus clientes. Baregheh, Rowley e Sambrook (2009) definiram a inovação como um processo de múltiplos estágios pelo qual as organizações transformam ideias em novos produtos, serviços ou processos, com o objetivo de avançar, competir e se diferenciar com êxito em seus mercados.…”

Section: A Gestão Da Inovaçãounclassified

“…Entretanto, para que uma empresa obtenha sucesso na geração de inovação é possível encontrar na literatura que o processo de inovação deve apresentar algumas atividades básicas comuns que vão desde a geração de ideias para novos produtos e a gestão do processo para a completa inovação. Tais atividades são a geração de ideias que tem potencial pata se tornarem produtos ou processos após sua implementação, aquisição do conhecimento necessário e monitoramento do mercado após a implementação da ideia a fim de verificar a satisfação do consumidor (Cagnazzo et al, 2008).…”

Section: A Gestão Da Inovaçãounclassified

A Gestão Da Inovação Em Pme’s E Suas Perspectivas Atuais: Um Estudo De Meta-Síntese

Serpe¹

2021

Gestão e Inovação

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumoAs pequenas empresas constituem parte importante da produção de renda. Visando contribuir nesse contexto, esta pesquisa teve por objetivo mapear as principais problemáticas que foram levantadas em estudos de caso qualitativos sobre gestão da inovação em PMEs nos últimos 5 anos, fazendo uma análise aprofundada desses estudos. Foi utilizada a metodologia de metasíntese por meio de uma seleção de estudos de casos relevantes. Os estudos avaliados versaram sobre assuntos relacionados às vantagens e necessidades de inovação em pequenos negócios, desde o contexto latino-americano para a inovação em PMEs, as vantagens competitivas na clusterização de pequenos negócios, conexões para o aprendizado em inovação, necessidade de criação de novos produtos, acumulação de capacidades para a inovação, inovação como vantagem competitiva e desenvolvimento da inovação de produto em pequenas empresas. A análise dos artigos aponta para uma dificuldade de empresas de pequeno porte em desenvolverem atividades de inovação, devido a fatores cruciais, como falta de apoio externo e dificuldade de compreensão sobre as dimensões envolvidas em um processo de inovação. Por meio desses estudos foi possível construir um framework teórico que emergiu da análise dos casos e explica o ciclo da inovação no contexto das PMEs e constitui-se como contribuição teórica. Acredita-se que esse modelo possa servir de base para estudos futuros que avancem na temática. Como contribuição prática foi oferecido um mapeamento de aspectos sobre inovação tecnológica em PMEs, auxiliando gestores a melhorar a rentabilidade e a competitividade organizacional.Palavras-chave: Gestão da inovação. PMEs. Estudos de caso.

show abstract

A literature review on innovation management tools

Cited by 7 publications

References 39 publications

A systematic review of research on innovation in hospitality and tourism

A systematic review of research on innovation in hospitality and tourism

Collaborative innovation: catalyst for a destination’s event success

A Gestão Da Inovação Em Pme’s E Suas Perspectivas Atuais: Um Estudo De Meta-Síntese

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About