2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49788-0_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Literature Review of the Research on the Uncanny Valley

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To examine whether these effects also extended to the nonlinear association between anthropomorphism and likability, we extended the previous meta-regression analyses and included respective interactions for the linear, quadratic, and cubic terms. However, inconsistent with assumption (e), these interactions were not significant (see Table 2), thus, indicating that movement and communication did not moderate the predicted effects given in Complementing and extending insights gained from narrative reviews on the uncanny valley hypothesis (Kätsyri et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2020), we presented the first quantitative, meta-analytical review of the main assumptions underlying the uncanny valley effect. We focused on the characteristic relationship between user assessments of human likeness (the x-axis) and likability (the y-axis) that was proposed by Mori (1970, Figure 1), based on the Godspeed scales (Bartneck, Kulić, et al, 2009), a standard measure in the field (cf.…”
Section: Movement and Other Moderating Effectsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To examine whether these effects also extended to the nonlinear association between anthropomorphism and likability, we extended the previous meta-regression analyses and included respective interactions for the linear, quadratic, and cubic terms. However, inconsistent with assumption (e), these interactions were not significant (see Table 2), thus, indicating that movement and communication did not moderate the predicted effects given in Complementing and extending insights gained from narrative reviews on the uncanny valley hypothesis (Kätsyri et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2020), we presented the first quantitative, meta-analytical review of the main assumptions underlying the uncanny valley effect. We focused on the characteristic relationship between user assessments of human likeness (the x-axis) and likability (the y-axis) that was proposed by Mori (1970, Figure 1), based on the Godspeed scales (Bartneck, Kulić, et al, 2009), a standard measure in the field (cf.…”
Section: Movement and Other Moderating Effectsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, due to inconsistent empirical evidence, the existence of the uncanny valley effect and the conditions under which it is more or less pronounced are a matter of debate (cf. Kätsyri et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2020). Given the great popularity of the uncanny valley hypothesis, it is surprising that its basic propositions still lack systematic empirical corroboration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade, the number of empirical investigations of human-robot relationships and determinants of robot acceptance has steadily increased, many of which have dealt with potentially aversive reactions to human-like machines. However, due to inconsistent empirical evidence, the existence of the uncanny valley effect and the conditions under which it is more or less pronounced are a matter of debate (see Kätsyri et al, 2015; Wang et al, 2015; Zhang et al, 2020). Given the great popularity of the uncanny valley hypothesis, it is surprising that its basic propositions still lack systematic empirical corroboration.…”
Section: Human-like Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 2005, UV research has flourished, presenting a wide range of theories. Empirical studies have focused mainly on determining whether the UV effect exists or on testing the predictions of one of these theories ( Kätsyri, Förger, Mäkäräinen, & Takala, 2015 ; Lay, Brace, Pike, & Pollick, 2016 ; Zhang et al, 2020 ). More than two-thirds of UV studies have found that the UV effect exists ( Burleigh, Schoenherr, & Lacroix, 2013 ; Kim, Bruce, Brown, Visser, & Phillips, 2020 ; MacDorman & Ishiguro, 2006 ; Mathur & Reichling, 2015 ; Mathur et al, 2020 ; McDonnell, Breidt, & Bülthoff, 2012 ; Seyama & Nagayama, 2007 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%